2011 Subaru
Forester 2.5XT Touring
vs. 2012 Chevrolet
Traverse LT

2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring

9.8

starting from

$30,720

Reasons to buy the Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring

Badge
Good ground clearance for rough terrain
8.9"
Badge
Turbocharged engine improves performance
Badge
Moon roof
Standard
Badge
Power outlets
Standard
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT

9.4

starting from

$33,340

Reasons to buy the Chevrolet Traverse LT

Badge
Ample cargo space
116.4 ft3
Badge
Safer for passengers in the rear in side collisions
5 stars
Badge
Average power
281 HP @ 6,300 RPM
Badge
More passenger seats
8
Luxury Features 10.0 vs 8.6
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring Winner: Forester 2.5XT Touring
[details]
  • Enjoy additional natural light with the Forester 2.5XT Touring's standard sun roof
  • Leather-appointed interiors are available on both; but it comes standard with the Forester 2.5XT Touring
Crash Test Ratings 9.6 vs 10.0
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT Winner: Traverse LT
[details]
  • The Traverse LT has 2.1x less risk of serious injury, 5 stars vs 4 stars
Cost 10.0 vs 9.6
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring Winner: Forester 2.5XT Touring
[details]
  • Gets more than 10% more miles per gallon in the city, 19 mpg vs 17 mpg
  • The best price we've seen is $2,620 cheaper (around 10% less), $30,720 vs $33,340
Safety Features 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
Performance 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Both offer a semi-automatic transmission, quite rare for this class
Practicality 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
Entertainment System 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Both can be upgraded to include an entertainment system
Road Tests 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability
Overall 9.8 vs 9.4

Luxury Features

Subaru
Forester 2.5XT Touring
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT Chevrolet
Traverse LT
Help
moon roof Standard vs Not Available Enjoy additional natural light with the Forester 2.5XT Touring's standard sun roof
Help
power seats Standard vs Standard Both have power seats
Help
keyless entry Standard vs Standard Both have keyless entry
Help
leather Standard vs Optional Leather-appointed interiors are available on both; but it comes standard with the Forester 2.5XT Touring

Crash Test Ratings

Subaru
Forester 2.5XT Touring
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT Chevrolet
Traverse LT
Help
Rollover resistance 4 stars vs 4 stars Good protection, only 10% to 20% chance of rolling over during emergency lane change
Help
Front driver crash test 4 stars vs 5 stars The Traverse LT is 2.1x safer than the Forester 2.5XT Touring
Help
Driver side crash test 5 stars vs 5 stars OK protection, 5% chance of serious chest injuries in a crash

Cost

Subaru
Forester 2.5XT Touring
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT Chevrolet
Traverse LT
Help
MSRP $30,720 vs $33,340 The Forester 2.5XT Touring has a great price and the Traverse LT is pretty reasonable
Help
In-city gas mileage 19 mpg vs 17 mpg The Forester 2.5XT Touring has great city mileage and the Traverse LT is pretty reasonable
Help
basic warranty miles 36,000 mile vs 36,000 mile Shorter basic warranty
Help
basic warranty years 3 year vs 3 year Shorter-lasting basic warranty

Safety Features

Subaru
Forester 2.5XT Touring
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT Chevrolet
Traverse LT
Help
antilock brakes Standard vs Standard Both come standard with ABS brakes
Help
Stability control system Yes vs Unknown
Help
Airbags 4 vs 5 The Traverse LT has an OK number of airbags while the Forester 2.5XT Touring has very few (missing Rear Curtain)
Help
Rear brakes Disc vs Disc Both have the usual brakes for this class of vehicle
Help
child door locks Standard vs Standard Child door locks come standard
Help
Roadside assistance system None vs OnStar

Performance

Subaru
Forester 2.5XT Touring
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT Chevrolet
Traverse LT
Help
Horsepower 224 HP @ 5,200 RPM vs 281 HP @ 6,300 RPM The Traverse LT is of average power, but the Forester 2.5XT Touring is underpowered
Help
Number of gears 4 vs 6 The Traverse LT has more gears, but the Forester 2.5XT Touring has very few
Help
Transmission Semi-automatic transmission vs Semi-automatic transmission Both offer a semi-automatic transmission, quite rare for this class
Help
paddle shifters Not Available vs Unknown
Help
Air compressor Turbocharger vs None The Forester 2.5XT Touring's Turbocharger lets it maximize power output, quite rare for this class of vehicle
Help
Power-to-weight ratio 15.4 lb/hp vs 16.6 lb/hp The Forester 2.5XT Touring is a sporty car, while the Traverse LT is just average
Help
Drivetrain type all-wheel drive vs two-wheel drive The Forester 2.5XT Touring has a good drivetrain for off-road and poor weather driving
Help
Curb-to-curb turning radius 34.4 ft vs 40.4 ft The Forester 2.5XT Touring can make tight turns, and the Traverse LT is comparable to most other vehicles

Practicality

Subaru
Forester 2.5XT Touring
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT Chevrolet
Traverse LT
Help
Passengers 5 vs 8 The Traverse LT has lots of passenger seats, but the Forester 2.5XT Touring has very few
Help
Cargo space 30.8 ft3 vs 116.4 ft3 The Traverse LT has lots of cargo room, but the Forester 2.5XT Touring has very little
Help
front seats 56.0 ft3 vs 59.9 ft3 The Traverse LT has roomy front seats and the Forester 2.5XT Touring is OK
Help
Base payload capacity 1065 lb vs Unknown
Help
folding rear seats Standard vs Standard Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
Help
power outlets Standard vs Optional The Forester 2.5XT Touring's standard power outlet will keep your gadgets charged; requires optional upgrade on the Traverse LT
Help
navigation system Optional vs Optional Both offer an upgrade to a navigation system
Help
Cupholders 8 vs Unknown
Help
front air conditioning Standard vs Standard A/C for hot summer days comes standard

Entertainment System

Subaru
Forester 2.5XT Touring
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT Chevrolet
Traverse LT
Help
Number of speakers 6 vs Unknown
Help
Has speed sensitive volume No vs Unknown
Help
CD player Standard vs Standard CD player comes standard
Help
premium radio Not Available vs Optional Like your tunes? In the Traverse LT, you can upgrade to satellite radio
Help
Has auxiliary audio input Yes vs Unknown
Help
Has subwoofer Yes vs Unknown
Help
entertainment system Optional vs Optional Both can be upgraded to include an entertainment system

Road Tests

Subaru
Forester 2.5XT Touring
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT Chevrolet
Traverse LT
Help
0-60 mph 7.2 seconds vs 7.9 seconds The Forester 2.5XT Touring has a good 0-60 time, but the Traverse LT is just average
Help
Braking distance at 60mph 135 ft vs 141 ft The Forester 2.5XT Touring's braking ability is average for this class of vehicle, but the Traverse LT is quite bad
Help
1/4 mile 15.6 s @ 91 mph vs 16.2 s @ 87 mph The Forester 2.5XT Touring's 1/4 mile time is zippy, but the Traverse LT's is just OK
Help
Lateral acceleration 0.81 g vs 0.8 g Both vehicles have good cornering ability
Help
Top speed 125 mph vs Unknown

Other Vehicles to Consider

2011 Subaru Forester 2.5X Premium 2011 Nissan Rogue SV Forester 2.5X Premium vs Rogue SV
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5X 2011 Toyota Highlander Forester 2.5X vs Highlander
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring 2011 BMW X3 xDrive28i Forester 2.5XT Touring vs X3 xDrive28i
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring 2011 Subaru Tribeca Limited Forester 2.5XT Touring vs Tribeca Limited
2011 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Touring 2011 Subaru Legacy 2.5GT Forester 2.5XT Touring vs Legacy 2.5GT
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LS 2011 Chevrolet Equinox LT Traverse LS vs Equinox LT
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT 2011 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ Traverse LT vs Tahoe LTZ
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LTZ 2011 Buick Enclave CXL Traverse LTZ vs Enclave CXL
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LS 2011 GMC Terrain SLT Traverse LS vs Terrain SLT
2012 Chevrolet Traverse LT 2011 Ford Edge SE Traverse LT vs Edge SE

Comments Which car would you recommend, and why?

Showing 0 comments