2011 Kia
Optima LX
vs. 2012 Chevrolet
Malibu LTZ

2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ

9.5

starting from

$29,245

Reasons to buy the Chevrolet Malibu LTZ

Badge
Power windows
Standard
Badge
Cruise control
Standard
Badge
Less safe for the driver in side collisions
4 stars
Badge
Leather
Standard
2011 Kia Optima LX

8.9

Runner-up

Kia Optima LX

starting from

$19,950
"Audio quality is balanced with a nice neutral sound ."
reviews.cnet.com | talking about the Optima's stereo
"Great combination of power, handling, safety and fuel economy."
reviews.cnet.com | talking about the Optima's ride quality

Reasons to buy the Kia Optima LX

Badge
Longer-lasting basic warranty
5 year
Badge
Longer basic warranty
60,000 mile
Badge
Safer for the front passenger in head-on collisions
5 stars
Badge
Less chance of rolling over during emergency lane change
5 stars
Luxury Features 6.6 vs 10.0
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ Winner: Malibu LTZ
[details]
  • Leather comes standard on the Malibu LTZ; the Optima LX only offers cloth seats
  • Enjoy additional natural light with the Malibu LTZ's standard sun roof
  • Conveniently adjust your seat with the Malibu LTZ's power seats; not available on the Optima LX
Cost 10.0 vs 9.0
2011 Kia Optima LX Winner: Optima LX
[details]
  • Basic warranty lasts 2 more years, 5 year vs 3 year
  • Basic warranty lasts 24,000 more miles, 60,000 mile vs 36,000 mile
  • The best price we've seen is $9,295 cheaper (more than 30% less), $19,950 vs $29,245
Crash Test Ratings 10.0 vs 9.6
2011 Kia Optima LX Winner: Optima LX
[details]
  • The Optima LX has 1.5x less risk of rolling over, 5 stars vs 4 stars
Road Tests - vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Both have pokey 1/4 mile times
  • Both have sluggish 0-60 times
  • Both have subpar cornering abilities
Safety Features 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Child door locks come standard
Performance 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Neither has an air compressor to maximize power output
  • Neither has a good drivetrain for off-road or bad weather driving
Practicality 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Both can go pretty far on the highway on a single tank, however the Optima LX in particular gets exceptional range
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Neither offers a navigation system
Entertainment System 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Neither offers an entertainment system
  • Neither offers satellite radio
Overall 8.9 vs 9.5

Luxury Features

Kia
Optima LX
2011 Kia Optima LX
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ Chevrolet
Malibu LTZ
Help
moon roof Not Available vs Standard Enjoy additional natural light with the Malibu LTZ's standard sun roof
Help
power seats Not Available vs Standard Conveniently adjust your seat with the Malibu LTZ's power seats; not available on the Optima LX
Help
keyless entry Standard vs Standard Both have keyless entry
Help
leather Not Available vs Standard Leather comes standard on the Malibu LTZ; the Optima LX only offers cloth seats

Cost

Kia
Optima LX
2011 Kia Optima LX
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ Chevrolet
Malibu LTZ
Help
MSRP $19,950 vs $29,245 The Optima LX has a great price and the Malibu LTZ is pretty reasonable
Help
In-city gas mileage 24 mpg vs 22 mpg Both get OK mileage in the city
Help
basic warranty miles 60,000 mile vs 36,000 mile The Optima LX's basic warranty is fantastic, but the Malibu LTZ's warranty is very limited
Help
basic warranty years 5 year vs 3 year The Optima LX's basic warranty is fantastically long-lasting, but the Malibu LTZ's warranty is very limited

Crash Test Ratings

Kia
Optima LX
2011 Kia Optima LX
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ Chevrolet
Malibu LTZ
Help
Rollover resistance 5 stars vs 4 stars The Optima LX is exceptionally safe; 1.5x safer than the Malibu LTZ
Help
Front driver crash test 5 stars vs 5 stars Good protection, only 10% chance of serious head or chest injuries in a crash
Help
Driver side crash test 3 stars vs 4 stars Poor protection, 11% to 20% chance of serious chest injuries in a crash

Road Tests

Kia
Optima LX
2011 Kia Optima LX
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ Chevrolet
Malibu LTZ
Help
0-60 mph 9.2 seconds vs 9.0 seconds Both have sluggish 0-60 times
Help
Braking distance at 60mph 121 ft vs 130 ft The Optima LX has above average braking ability for this class of vehicle, but the Malibu LTZ is just OK
Help
1/4 mile 16.9 s @ 84 mph vs 16.8 s @ 84 mph Both have pokey 1/4 mile times
Help
Lateral acceleration 0.76 g vs 0.75 g Both have subpar cornering abilities
Help
Top speed Unknown vs Unknown

Safety Features

Kia
Optima LX
2011 Kia Optima LX
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ Chevrolet
Malibu LTZ
Help
antilock brakes Standard vs Standard Both come standard with ABS brakes
Help
Stability control system Yes vs Unknown
Help
Airbags 5 vs 5 OK number of airbags
Help
Rear brakes Disc vs Disc Both have the usual brakes for this class of vehicle
Help
child door locks Standard vs Standard Child door locks come standard
Help
Roadside assistance system None vs OnStar

Performance

Kia
Optima LX
2011 Kia Optima LX
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ Chevrolet
Malibu LTZ
Help
Horsepower 200 HP @ 6,300 RPM vs 169 HP @ 6,400 RPM The Optima LX is of average power, but the Malibu LTZ is underpowered
Help
Number of gears 6 vs 6 Average number of gears
Help
Transmission Manual transmission vs Semi-automatic transmission Both the Malibu LTZ's semi-automatic transmission and the Optima LX's Manual transmission are unusual transmissions for this class of vehicle
Help
paddle shifters Not Available vs Unknown
Help
Air compressor None vs None Neither has an air compressor to maximize power output
Help
Power-to-weight ratio 16.0 lb/hp vs Unknown
Help
Drivetrain type front-wheel drive vs front-wheel drive Neither has a good drivetrain for off-road or bad weather driving
Help
Curb-to-curb turning radius 35.8 ft vs Unknown

Practicality

Kia
Optima LX
2011 Kia Optima LX
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ Chevrolet
Malibu LTZ
Help
Passengers 5 vs 5 Average number of seats
Help
Highway driving range 648 miles vs 528 miles Both can go pretty far on the highway on a single tank, however the Optima LX in particular gets exceptional range
Help
Cargo space 15.4 ft3 vs 15.1 ft3 Both have OK cargo room
Help
front seats 60.2 ft3 vs 53.8 ft3 The Optima LX has very spacious front seats, and the Malibu LTZ is OK
Help
folding rear seats Standard vs Standard Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
Help
power outlets Standard vs Standard Both have power outlets
Help
roof rails Not Available vs Not Available Neither offers roof rails
Help
navigation system Not Available vs Not Available Neither offers a navigation system
Help
Cupholders 8 vs Unknown
Help
front air conditioning Standard vs Standard A/C for hot summer days comes standard

Entertainment System

Kia
Optima LX
2011 Kia Optima LX
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ Chevrolet
Malibu LTZ
Help
Number of speakers 6 vs Unknown
Help
Has speed sensitive volume No vs Unknown
Help
CD player Standard vs Standard CD player comes standard
Help
premium radio Not Available vs Not Available Neither offers satellite radio
Help
Has auxiliary audio input Yes vs Unknown
Help
Has subwoofer No vs Unknown
Help
entertainment system Not Available vs Not Available Neither offers an entertainment system

Other Vehicles to Consider

2011 Kia Optima EX 2011 BMW 328i Optima EX vs 328i
2011 Kia Optima EX 2012 Hyundai Genesis 3.8 Optima EX vs Genesis 3.8
2011 Kia Optima SX 2011 Audi A4 Premium Optima SX vs A4 Premium
2011 Kia Optima Hybrid 2011 Toyota Prius Two Optima Hybrid vs Prius Two
2011 Kia Optima EX 2011 Nissan Maxima SV Optima EX vs Maxima SV
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LT 2012 Chevrolet Cruze LT Malibu LT vs Cruze LT
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LT 2012 Chevrolet Impala LT Malibu LT vs Impala LT
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ 2011 Nissan Maxima SV Malibu LTZ vs Maxima SV
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LS 2011 Chevrolet Equinox LS Malibu LS vs Equinox LS
2012 Chevrolet Malibu LS 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LS Malibu LS vs Cobalt LS

Comments Which car would you recommend, and why?

Showing 0 comments