2011 Ford
Taurus SHO
vs. 2011 Lincoln
MKS Ecoboost

2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost

9.8

starting from

$49,265
"Good power and fuel economy from the turbocharged V6."
edmunds.com | talking about the MKS's performance
"Has the potential to battle for the hearts and minds of luxury car buyers."
edmunds.com | talking about the MKS's external styling

Reasons to buy the Lincoln MKS Ecoboost

Badge
Longer basic warranty
50,000 mile
Badge
Longer-lasting basic warranty
4 year
Badge
Entertainment system
Optional
Badge
Average top speed
134 mph
2011 Ford Taurus SHO

9.6

Runner-up

Ford Taurus SHO

starting from

$38,950
"More of a driver's car than ever before."
theautochannel.com | talking about the Taurus's ride quality
"Full-size sedans are not dead!"
theautochannel.com | talking about the Taurus's overall satisfaction

Reasons to buy the Ford Taurus SHO

Badge
Folding rear seats
Standard
Badge
Mediocre cornering
0.81 g
Badge
Has rear spoiler
Badge
Zippy 1/4 mile time
13.7 s @ 103 mph
Entertainment System 8.0 vs 10.0
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Winner: MKS Ecoboost
[details]
  • The MKS Ecoboost's subwoofer accurately reproduces deep bass notes in music
  • It'll cost you to get an entertainment system on the MKS Ecoboost; but it's not available at all on the Taurus SHO
  • Have your pick of music from around the world with the MKS Ecoboost's satellite radio; in the Taurus SHO, too, but it'll cost
Practicality 10.0 vs 9.6
2011 Ford Taurus SHO Winner: Taurus SHO
[details]
  • The Taurus SHO's standard folding rear seat will get you extra cargo room; not available on the MKS Ecoboost
  • The Taurus SHO has 2 more cupholders, 8 vs 6
  • Room for around 10% more stuff, 20.1 ft3 vs 18.4 ft3
Cost 9.6 vs 10.0
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Winner: MKS Ecoboost
[details]
  • Basic warranty lasts 14,000 more miles, 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile
  • Basic warranty lasts 1 more year, 4 year vs 3 year
Road Tests 10.0 vs 9.6
2011 Ford Taurus SHO Winner: Taurus SHO
[details]
  • The Taurus SHO can change direction around 10% faster, 0.81 g vs 0.75 g
  • Around 10% faster in the 1/4 mile, 13.7 s @ 103 mph vs 14.7 s @ 99 mph
  • The Taurus SHO hits 60mph more than 10% faster, 5.2 seconds vs 6.0 seconds
Safety Features 10.0 vs 10.0
Too close to call
[details]
  • Child door locks come standard
Performance 10.0 vs 10.0
Too close to call
[details]
  • Both come standard with paddle shifters
  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle
  • Both have good drivetrains for driving off-road or in poor weather
Luxury Features 10.0 vs 10.0
Too close to call
[details]
  • Both come standard with leather interiors
  • Both have power seats
  • Neither offers a sun roof
Crash Test Ratings 10.0 vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Poor protection, 10% to 20% chance of rolling over during emergency lane change
Overall 9.6 vs 9.8

Entertainment System

Ford
Taurus SHO
2011 Ford Taurus SHO
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Lincoln
MKS Ecoboost
Help
Number of speakers 7 vs 6 The Taurus SHO has an OK number of speakers, while the MKS Ecoboost has very few
Help
Has speed sensitive volume No vs No Neither offers speed-sensitive volume
Help
CD player Standard vs Standard CD player comes standard
Help
premium radio Optional vs Standard Have your pick of music from around the world with the MKS Ecoboost's satellite radio; in the Taurus SHO, too, but it'll cost
Help
Has auxiliary audio input Yes vs Yes Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
Help
Has subwoofer No vs Yes The MKS Ecoboost has a subwoofer to accurately produce deep bass frequencies in music
Help
entertainment system Not Available vs Optional It'll cost you to get an entertainment system on the MKS Ecoboost; but it's not available at all on the Taurus SHO

Practicality

Ford
Taurus SHO
2011 Ford Taurus SHO
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Lincoln
MKS Ecoboost
Help
Passengers 5 vs 5 Average number of seats
Help
Highway driving range 475 miles vs 475 miles Average highway range
Help
Cargo space 20.1 ft3 vs 18.4 ft3 Both have OK cargo room
Help
front seats 54.8 ft3 vs 56.4 ft3 Both have spacious front seats
Help
folding rear seats Standard vs Not Available The Taurus SHO's standard folding rear seat will get you extra cargo room; not available on the MKS Ecoboost
Help
power outlets Standard vs Standard Both have power outlets
Help
roof rails Not Available vs Not Available Neither offers roof rails
Help
navigation system Optional vs Optional Both offer an upgrade to a navigation system
Help
Cupholders 8 vs 6 Both have a good number of cupholders but the Taurus SHO is particularly good
Help
front air conditioning Standard vs Standard A/C for hot summer days comes standard

Cost

Ford
Taurus SHO
2011 Ford Taurus SHO
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Lincoln
MKS Ecoboost
Help
MSRP $38,950 vs $49,265 The Taurus SHO has a reasonable price, while the MKS Ecoboost is very expensive
Help
In-city gas mileage 17 mpg vs 17 mpg Very inefficient in the city
Help
basic warranty miles 36,000 mile vs 50,000 mile The MKS Ecoboost's %s warranty covers lots of miles, but the Taurus SHO's doesn't cover many
Help
basic warranty years 3 year vs 4 year The MKS Ecoboost's basic warranty is long lasting, but the Taurus SHO's is very short

Road Tests

Ford
Taurus SHO
2011 Ford Taurus SHO
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Lincoln
MKS Ecoboost
Help
0-60 mph 5.2 seconds vs 6.0 seconds Both vehicles have good 0-60 times
Help
Braking distance at 60mph 139 ft vs 139 ft Both take longer to stop from 60mph
Help
1/4 mile 13.7 s @ 103 mph vs 14.7 s @ 99 mph Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times
Help
Lateral acceleration 0.81 g vs 0.75 g Both have subpar cornering abilities
Help
Top speed 115 mph vs 134 mph The MKS Ecoboost's top speed is average for this class of vehicle, but the Taurus SHO is just OK

Safety Features

Ford
Taurus SHO
2011 Ford Taurus SHO
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Lincoln
MKS Ecoboost
Help
antilock brakes Standard vs Standard Both come standard with ABS brakes
Help
Stability control system Yes vs Yes Both have electronic stability control
Help
Airbags 5 vs 5 OK number of airbags
Help
Rear brakes Disc vs Disc Both have the usual brakes for this class of vehicle
Help
child door locks Standard vs Standard Child door locks come standard
Help
Roadside assistance system None vs None

Performance

Ford
Taurus SHO
2011 Ford Taurus SHO
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Lincoln
MKS Ecoboost
Help
Horsepower 365 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 355 HP @ 5,700 RPM Fairly powerful
Help
Number of gears 6 vs 6 Average number of gears
Help
Transmission Automatic transmission vs Semi-automatic transmission The MKS Ecoboost's semi-automatic transmission is a rare find for this class of vehicle
Help
paddle shifters Standard vs Standard Both come standard with paddle shifters
Help
Air compressor Turbocharger vs Turbocharger Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle
Help
Power-to-weight ratio 12.0 lb/hp vs 12.1 lb/hp Both provide sporty handling
Help
Drivetrain type all-wheel drive vs all-wheel drive Both have good drivetrains for driving off-road or in poor weather
Help
Curb-to-curb turning radius 39.7 ft vs 39.7 ft Caution: these vehicles make wide turns

Luxury Features

Ford
Taurus SHO
2011 Ford Taurus SHO
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Lincoln
MKS Ecoboost
Help
moon roof Not Available vs Not Available Neither offers a sun roof
Help
power seats Standard vs Standard Both have power seats
Help
keyless entry Standard vs Standard Both have keyless entry
Help
leather Standard vs Standard Both come standard with leather interiors

Crash Test Ratings

Ford
Taurus SHO
2011 Ford Taurus SHO
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost Lincoln
MKS Ecoboost
Help
Rollover resistance 4 stars vs 4 stars Poor protection, 10% to 20% chance of rolling over during emergency lane change
Help
Front driver crash test 5 stars vs Unknown
Help
Driver side crash test 5 stars vs Unknown

Other Vehicles to Consider

2011 Ford Taurus SHO 2011 Dodge Charger R/T Taurus SHO vs Charger R/T
2011 Ford Taurus SHO 2012 Ford Mustang GT Taurus SHO vs Mustang GT
2011 Ford Taurus SEL 2012 Ford Fusion SEL Taurus SEL vs Fusion SEL
2011 Ford Taurus SHO 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 Taurus SHO vs Challenger SRT8
2011 Ford Taurus SE 2012 Ford Focus S Taurus SE vs Focus S
2011 Lincoln MKS 2012 Lincoln MKZ MKS vs MKZ
2011 Lincoln MKS 2012 Buick LaCrosse MKS vs LaCrosse
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost 2011 Lincoln Town Car Signature Limited MKS Ecoboost vs Town Car Signature Limited
2011 Lincoln MKS Ecoboost 2011 Chrysler 300 300C MKS Ecoboost vs 300 300C
2011 Lincoln MKS 2011 Mercedes-Benz S550 MKS vs S550

Comments Which car would you recommend, and why?

Showing 1 comments

Avatar for Scott Becker Scott Becker (2:23 AM, December 01, 2011)
A lot of this is just not accurate.  For example, both cars have moonroofs and the MKS actually has a panoramic roof as well.  I have an MKS econoboost and get 28-29 mile per gallon on the highway, but there is no mention of this.  If cost is an object, its a whole lot cheaper to buy an extended warranty than to buy the MKS because it has a longer warranty so the comments on this are inane.