|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Luxury Features
|
|
||||||||||
 |
moon roof | Not Available | vs | Standard | Enjoy additional natural light with the Impreza WRX Limited's standard sun roof | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
power seats | Standard | vs | Not Available | Conveniently adjust your seat with the Charger R/T's power seats; not available on the Impreza WRX Limited | ||||||
|
keyless entry | Standard | vs | Standard | Both have keyless entry | ||||||
|
leather | Optional | vs | Standard | Leather-appointed interiors are available on both; but it comes standard with the Impreza WRX Limited | ||||||
Cost
|
|
||||||||||
|
MSRP | $31,220 | vs | $29,720 | Both are priced reasonably | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In-city gas mileage | 16 mpg | vs | 19 mpg | The Impreza WRX Limited has OK city mileage, while the Charger R/T is very inefficient | ||||||
|
basic warranty miles | 36,000 mile | vs | 36,000 mile | Shorter basic warranty | ||||||
|
basic warranty years | 3 year | vs | 3 year | Shorter-lasting basic warranty | ||||||
Road Tests
|
|
||||||||||
|
0-60 mph | 5.4 seconds | vs | 5.3 seconds | Both vehicles have good 0-60 times | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Braking distance at 60mph | 114 ft | vs | 125 ft | The Charger R/T has above average braking ability for this class of vehicle, but the Impreza WRX Limited is just OK | ||||||
|
1/4 mile | 13.7 s @ 102 mph | vs | 14.0 s @ 98 mph | Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times | ||||||
|
Lateral acceleration | 0.81 g | vs | 0.93 g | The Impreza WRX Limited has good cornering abilities, but the Charger R/T is not very good for this class of vehicle | ||||||
|
Top speed | 155 mph | vs | 144 mph | The Charger R/T can hit high speeds, but the Impreza WRX Limited cannot | ||||||
Crash Test Ratings
|
|
||||||||||
|
Rollover resistance | Unknown | vs | 4 stars | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Front driver crash test | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Driver side crash test | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
Practicality
|
|
||||||||||
|
Passengers | 5 | vs | 5 | Average number of seats | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Highway driving range | 478 miles | vs | 422 miles | The Charger R/T has OK highway range, but the Impreza WRX Limited is very limited | ||||||
|
Cargo space | 15.4 ft3 | vs | 11.3 ft3 | Both have OK cargo room | ||||||
|
front seats | 55.6 ft3 | vs | 54.2 ft3 | The Charger R/T has roomy front seats and the Impreza WRX Limited is OK | ||||||
|
folding rear seats | Standard | vs | Standard | Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space | ||||||
|
power outlets | Standard | vs | Standard | Both have power outlets | ||||||
|
roof rails | Not Available | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
navigation system | Optional | vs | Optional | Both offer an upgrade to a navigation system | ||||||
|
Cupholders | Unknown | vs | 6 | |||||||
|
front air conditioning | Standard | vs | Standard | A/C for hot summer days comes standard | ||||||
Entertainment System
|
|
||||||||||
|
Number of speakers | Unknown | vs | 6 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Has speed sensitive volume | Unknown | vs | No | |||||||
|
CD player | Standard | vs | Standard | CD player comes standard | ||||||
|
premium radio | Not Available | vs | Not Available | Neither offers satellite radio | ||||||
|
Has auxiliary audio input | Unknown | vs | Yes | |||||||
|
Has subwoofer | Unknown | vs | No | |||||||
|
entertainment system | Standard | vs | Optional | Both cars offer an entertainment system for passengers, but it'll cost extra to get it on the Impreza WRX Limited | ||||||
Performance
|
|
||||||||||
|
Horsepower | 370 HP @ 5,250 RPM | vs | 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM | The Charger R/T is fairly powerful, but the Impreza WRX Limited is not far behind | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of gears | 5 | vs | 5 | Average number of gears | ||||||
|
Transmission | Semi-automatic transmission | vs | Manual transmission | Both the Charger R/T's semi-automatic transmission and the Impreza WRX Limited's Manual transmission are unusual transmissions for this class of vehicle | ||||||
|
paddle shifters | Unknown | vs | Not Available | |||||||
|
Air compressor | None | vs | Turbocharger | The Impreza WRX Limited's Turbocharger lets it maximize power output, quite rare for this class of vehicle | ||||||
|
Power-to-weight ratio | 11.5 lb/hp | vs | 12.2 lb/hp | Both provide sporty handling | ||||||
|
Drivetrain type | rear-wheel drive | vs | all-wheel drive | The Impreza WRX Limited has a good drivetrain for driving off-road or in poor weather | ||||||
|
Curb-to-curb turning radius | 37.7 ft | vs | 35.4 ft | The Impreza WRX Limited is comparable to most other vehicles for turning, but the Charger R/T is quite bad | ||||||
Safety Features
|
|
||||||||||
|
antilock brakes | Standard | vs | Standard | Both come standard with ABS brakes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Stability control system | Unknown | vs | Yes | |||||||
|
Airbags | 6 | vs | 5 | The Charger R/T has a good number of airbags, but the Impreza WRX Limited is just OK (missing Knee) | ||||||
|
Rear brakes | Disc | vs | Disc | Both have the usual brakes for this class of vehicle | ||||||
|
child door locks | Standard | vs | Standard | Child door locks come standard | ||||||
|
Roadside assistance system | Uconnect | vs | None | |||||||
Showing 0 comments