2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Toyota Prius Competitors

$22-29k hybrid car, designed & built in Japan 51 city / 48 hwy 571-606 mile range, hybrid engine
134 hp 109 cu. in. 4-cylinder 5 stars stability control, ABS, child door locks

As well as being compared against other hybrid cars, the 2011 Toyota Prius Four is also often compared to sports cars, cars, mid-size SUVs and luxury cars. The 2011 Toyota Prius Four's top rivals come from Toyota (such as the Camry Hybrid and the Corolla ) and Ford (such as the Fusion SE and the Focus Titanium)

compared to hybrid car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Prius Four compared to other hybrid car competitors include: it has continuously-variable transmission (continuously variable vs traditional), uses hybrid technology, has slightly more seats (5 vs 4), gets much more from a tank of gas in the city (607 miles vs 329 miles) and gets significantly more from a tank of gas on the highway (571 miles vs 379 miles).

However, on average it is slightly less fuel efficient in the city (51 mpg vs 95 mpg), is slightly less fuel efficient on the highway (48 mpg vs 90 mpg), has slightly fewer gears (continuously variable vs 6), has rougher suspension (semi-independent vs independent) and higher risk of rolling over during emergency lane change (4 stars vs 5 stars).

2011 Toyota Camry Hybrid

2011 Toyota Camry Hybrid
$27,810

Significant advantages of the Camry Hybrid (vs the Prius Four)

  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Semi-independent
  • Power seats comes standard
  • Optional passenger power seats

Significant disadvantages of the Camry Hybrid (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much wider turning radius: 36.1 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Less safe in head-on crashes for the front passenger: 2 stars vs 4 stars
  • Significantly worse city mileage: 31 mpg vs 51 mpg

common strengths of the Camry Hybrid and Prius Four

  • Both have good airbag coverage: 6 vs 6
  • Good highway range: 602 miles vs 571 miles
  • Both vehicles' brakes will do well under heavy use
arrow Compare the Camry Hybrid vs the Prius Four

2011 Nissan LEAF SV

2011 Nissan LEAF SV
$33,630

Significant advantages of the LEAF SV (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much better city mileage: 106 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much better highway mileage: 92 mpg vs 48 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the LEAF SV (vs the Prius Four)

  • Hybrid
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving on the highway: 73 miles vs 571 miles
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 73 miles vs 607 miles

common strengths of the LEAF SV and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 106 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 92 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Good protection, only 5% chance of serious chest injuries in a crash: 5 stars vs 5 stars
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan LEAF SV vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Honda CR-Z

2011 Honda CR-Z
$20,115

Significant advantages of the CR-Z (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more gears: 6 vs Continuously variable
  • Less chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 5 stars vs 4 stars
  • Faster 1/4 mile time: 16.4 s s @ 83.6 mph mph vs 18.0 s s @ 79.0 mph mph

Significant disadvantages of the CR-Z (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 329 miles vs 607 miles
  • Much wider turning radius: 35.4 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Less safe in head-on crashes for the front passenger: 2 stars vs 4 stars

common strengths of the CR-Z and Prius Four

  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability: 0.84 g vs 0.82 g
  • Inexpensive: $20,115 vs $28,080
  • Both vehicles' brakes will do well under heavy use
arrow Compare the 2011 Honda CR-Z vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2012 Chevrolet Volt

2012 Chevrolet Volt
$39,995

Significant advantages of the Volt (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much better highway mileage: 90 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Much better city mileage: 95 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Less chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 5 stars vs 4 stars

Significant disadvantages of the Volt (vs the Prius Four)

  • Hybrid
  • Much wider turning radius: 37.5 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Keyless entry not available

common strengths of the Volt and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 90 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 95 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 6 vs 6
arrow Compare the 2012 Chevrolet Volt vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Lexus CT 200h

2011 Lexus CT 200h
$29,995

Significant advantages of the CT 200h (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile
  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 3 year
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Semi-independent

Significant disadvantages of the CT 200h (vs the Prius Four)

  • Power outlets not available
  • Child door locks must be bought separately
  • Power mirrors not available

common strengths of the CT 200h and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 43 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 7 vs 6
  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability: 0.85 g vs 0.82 g
arrow Compare the 2011 Lexus CT 200h vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

compared to sports car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Prius Four compared to sports car competitors include: it is much more fuel efficient in the city (51 mpg vs 17 mpg), is much more fuel efficient on the highway (48 mpg vs 23 mpg), has continuously-variable transmission (continuously variable vs traditional), uses hybrid technology and gets much more from a tank of gas in the city (607 miles vs 290 miles).

However, on average it doesn't have paddle shifters (not available vs standard), is slightly less powerful (134 HP @ 5,200 RPM vs 305 HP @ 6,000 RPM), much slower 0-60 time (10.6 seconds vs 5.4 seconds), slightly longer braking distance from 60mph (133 ft vs 110 ft) and much slower 1/4 mile time (18.0 s s @ 79.0 mph mph vs 13.8 s s @ 101.0 mph mph).

2011 MINI Cooper

2011 MINI Cooper
$20,100

Significant advantages of the Cooper (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more gears: 6 vs Continuously variable
  • Faster 0-60 mph time: 9.1 seconds vs 10.6 seconds
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Semi-independent

Significant disadvantages of the Cooper (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 29 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 35.1 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 383 miles vs 607 miles

common strengths of the Cooper and Prius Four

  • Very fuel efficient in the city: 29 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Very fuel efficient on the highway: 37 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Fantastic city range: 383 miles vs 607 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 MINI Cooper vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2012 Honda Civic Si

2012 Honda Civic Si
$22,975

Significant advantages of the Civic Si (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more gears: 6 vs Continuously variable
  • Sportier performance: 14.3 lb/hp vs 22.7 lb/hp
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Semi-independent

Significant disadvantages of the Civic Si (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 22 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 290 miles vs 607 miles
  • Much wider turning radius: 35.4 ft vs 17.1 ft

common strengths of the Civic Si and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 31 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $22,975 vs $28,080
arrow Compare the 2012 Honda Civic Si vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 MINI Cooper Countryman

2011 MINI Cooper Countryman
$22,350

Significant advantages of the Cooper Countryman (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more gears: 6 vs Continuously variable
  • Roof rails comes standard
  • Much more cargo room: 41.3 ft3 vs 21.6 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the Cooper Countryman (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 28 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 347 miles vs 607 miles
  • Doesn't have continuously variable transmission: Traditional vs Continuously variable

common strengths of the Cooper Countryman and Prius Four

  • Very fuel efficient in the city: 28 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Very fuel efficient on the highway: 35 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Fantastic city range: 347 miles vs 607 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 MINI Cooper Countryman vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG

2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG
$61,175

Significant advantages of the C63 AMG (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much faster 0-60 mph time: 4.0 seconds vs 10.6 seconds
  • Much faster 1/4 mile time: 12.4 s s @ 114.8 mph mph vs 18.0 s s @ 79.0 mph mph
  • Much higher top speed: 186 mph vs 112 mph

Significant disadvantages of the C63 AMG (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 13 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 226 miles vs 607 miles
  • Much worse highway mileage: 19 mpg vs 48 mpg

common strengths of the C63 AMG and Prius Four

  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Both have outstanding airbag coverage: 6 vs 6
  • Both have rear spoilers
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI
$34,720

Significant advantages of the Impreza WRX STI (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much faster 0-60 mph time: 5.4 seconds vs 10.6 seconds
  • Much faster 1/4 mile time: 13.8 s s @ 101.0 mph mph vs 18.0 s s @ 79.0 mph mph
  • Impreza WRX STI's Turbocharger increases power output: Turbocharger vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Impreza WRX STI (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 287 miles vs 607 miles
  • Much worse highway mileage: 23 mpg vs 48 mpg

common strengths of the Impreza WRX STI and Prius Four

  • Inexpensive: $34,720 vs $28,080
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Both come standard with leather interiors
arrow Compare the 2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

compared to car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Prius Four compared to car competitors include: it is much more fuel efficient in the city (51 mpg vs 24 mpg), is much more fuel efficient on the highway (48 mpg vs 33 mpg), has continuously-variable transmission (continuously variable vs traditional), uses hybrid technology and has slightly more airbags (6 vs 5).

However, on average it is slightly more sluggish (22.7 lb/hp vs 18.8 lb/hp), has slightly less spacious front seats (51.7 ft3 vs 54.4 ft3), has much fewer gears (continuously variable vs 5), has rougher suspension (semi-independent vs independent) and slightly slower 0-60 time (10.6 seconds vs 9.0 seconds).

2011 Toyota Corolla

2011 Toyota Corolla
$16,660

Significant advantages of the Corolla (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more gears: 5 vs Continuously variable
  • Many more cupholders: 8 vs 4
  • Speed sensitive volume

Significant disadvantages of the Corolla (vs the Prius Four)

  • Hybrid
  • Much worse city mileage: 28 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 35.4 ft vs 17.1 ft

common strengths of the Corolla and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 28 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 35 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Good protection, only 10% chance of serious head or chest injuries in a crash: 5 stars vs 5 stars
arrow Compare the Corolla vs the Prius Four

2012 Ford Fusion SE

2012 Ford Fusion SE
$23,625

Significant advantages of the Fusion SE (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more gears: 6 vs Continuously variable
  • Power seats comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Fusion SE (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 23 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 37.5 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Hybrid

common strengths of the Fusion SE and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 33 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Good protection, only 5% chance of serious chest injuries in a crash: 5 stars vs 5 stars
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
arrow Compare the 2012 Ford Fusion SE vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2012 Hyundai Sonata Limited

2012 Hyundai Sonata Limited
$27,105

Significant advantages of the Sonata Limited (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more gears: 6 vs Continuously variable
  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 5 year vs 3 year
  • Much longer basic warranty: 60,000 mile vs 36,000 mile

Significant disadvantages of the Sonata Limited (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 24 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Hybrid
  • Much wider turning radius: 35.8 ft vs 17.1 ft

common strengths of the Sonata Limited and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 35 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Fantastic city range: 444 miles vs 607 miles
  • Good highway range: 648 miles vs 571 miles
arrow Compare the 2012 Hyundai Sonata Limited vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Mazda 3 i Touring

2011 Mazda 3 i Touring
$19,745

Significant advantages of the 3 i Touring (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more gears: 5 vs Continuously variable
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Semi-independent
  • Many more cupholders: 8 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the 3 i Touring (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 24 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Hybrid
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 348 miles vs 607 miles

common strengths of the 3 i Touring and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 33 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Both can turn on a dime: 17.1 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Good protection, only 10% chance of serious head or chest injuries in a crash: 5 stars vs 5 stars
arrow Compare the 2011 Mazda 3 i Touring vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Subaru Outback 2.5i Limited

2011 Subaru Outback 2.5i Limited
$29,220

Significant advantages of the Outback 2.5i Limited (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much more cargo room: 71.3 ft3 vs 21.6 ft3
  • Better road traction: all-wheel drive vs front-wheel drive
  • Roof rails comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Outback 2.5i Limited (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 22 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Hybrid
  • Much wider turning radius: 36.8 ft vs 17.1 ft

common strengths of the Outback 2.5i Limited and Prius Four

  • Both have a continuously variable transmission for optimal fuel efficiency: Continuously variable vs Continuously variable
  • Good city range: 407 miles vs 607 miles
  • Good highway range: 536 miles vs 571 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Subaru Outback 2.5i Limited vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2012 Ford Focus Titanium

2012 Ford Focus Titanium
$23,495

Significant advantages of the Focus Titanium (vs the Prius Four)

  • Many more gears: 6 vs Continuously variable
  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 110 ft vs 133 ft
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Semi-independent

Significant disadvantages of the Focus Titanium (vs the Prius Four)

  • Hybrid
  • Much worse city mileage: 28 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 36.0 ft vs 17.1 ft

common strengths of the Focus Titanium and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 28 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 38 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 6 vs 6
arrow Compare the 2012 Ford Focus Titanium vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

compared to mid-size SUV competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Prius Four compared to mid-size SUV competitors include: it is much more fuel efficient in the city (51 mpg vs 22 mpg), is much more fuel efficient on the highway (48 mpg vs 28 mpg), has continuously-variable transmission (continuously variable vs traditional), uses hybrid technology and has significantly more airbags (6 vs 4).

However, on average it has much less cargo space (21.6 ft3 vs 57.9 ft3), is slightly less powerful (134 HP @ 5,200 RPM vs 179 HP @ 6,000 RPM), much less ground clearance (5.5" vs 8.3"), is significantly more sluggish (22.7 lb/hp vs 15.5 lb/hp) and has significantly less spacious front seats (51.7 ft3 vs 55.5 ft3).

2011 Honda CR-V

2011 Honda CR-V
$23,405

Significant advantages of the CR-V (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much more cargo room: 72.9 ft3 vs 21.6 ft3
  • Significantly more ground clearance for rough terrain: 6.7" vs 5.5"
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 55.6 ft3 vs 51.7 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the CR-V (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 21 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 37.8 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Much worse highway mileage: 28 mpg vs 48 mpg

common strengths of the CR-V and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 21 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 28 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Good protection, only 10% to 20% chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 4 stars vs 4 stars
arrow Compare the 2011 Honda CR-V vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Toyota RAV4 Limited

2011 Toyota RAV4 Limited
$26,275

Significant advantages of the RAV4 Limited (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much more cargo room: 73.0 ft3 vs 21.6 ft3
  • Much more ground clearance for rough terrain: 7.5" vs 5.5"
  • Number of rows of seating: 3 vs 2

Significant disadvantages of the RAV4 Limited (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 22 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 34.8 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Much worse highway mileage: 28 mpg vs 48 mpg

common strengths of the RAV4 Limited and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 28 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Both vehicles can make tight turns: 34.8 ft vs 17.1 ft
arrow Compare the RAV4 Limited vs the Prius Four

2011 Nissan JUKE SV

2011 Nissan JUKE SV
$21,640

Significant advantages of the JUKE SV (vs the Prius Four)

  • Significantly more ground clearance for rough terrain: 7" vs 5.5"
  • More cargo room: 35.9 ft3 vs 21.6 ft3
  • JUKE SV's Turbocharger increases power output: Turbocharger vs None

Significant disadvantages of the JUKE SV (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 24 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much worse highway mileage: 31 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 317 miles vs 607 miles

common strengths of the JUKE SV and Prius Four

  • Very fuel efficient in the city: 24 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Very fuel efficient on the highway: 31 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability: 0.83 g vs 0.82 g
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan JUKE SV vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Subaru Forester 2.5X

2011 Subaru Forester 2.5X
$21,220

Significant advantages of the Forester 2.5X (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much more ground clearance for rough terrain: 8.7" vs 5.5"
  • Much roomier front seats: 58.2 ft3 vs 51.7 ft3
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Semi-independent

Significant disadvantages of the Forester 2.5X (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 21 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much worse highway mileage: 27 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 34.4 ft vs 17.1 ft

common strengths of the Forester 2.5X and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 21 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 27 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Both can turn on a dime: 34.4 ft vs 17.1 ft
arrow Compare the 2011 Subaru Forester 2.5X vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 Nissan Rogue SV

2011 Nissan Rogue SV
$25,950

Significant advantages of the Rogue SV (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much more ground clearance for rough terrain: 8.3" vs 5.5"
  • Much more cargo room: 57.9 ft3 vs 21.6 ft3
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 55.5 ft3 vs 51.7 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the Rogue SV (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 22 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 37.4 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Much worse highway mileage: 26 mpg vs 48 mpg

common strengths of the Rogue SV and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 26 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Both have a continuously variable transmission for optimal fuel efficiency: Continuously variable vs Continuously variable
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan Rogue SV vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

compared to luxury car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Prius Four compared to luxury car competitors include: it is much more fuel efficient in the city (51 mpg vs 17 mpg), is much more fuel efficient on the highway (48 mpg vs 25 mpg), has continuously-variable transmission (continuously variable vs traditional), uses hybrid technology and has slightly more airbags (6 vs 5).

However, on average it doesn't have rear air conditioning (not available vs optional), is significantly more sluggish (22.7 lb/hp vs 15.7 lb/hp), is slightly less powerful (134 HP @ 5,200 RPM vs 230 HP @ 6,500 RPM), has a much shorter-lasting basic warranty (3 year vs 4 year) and has a much shorter basic warranty (36,000 mile vs 50,000 mile).

2011 Audi A4 Premium

2011 Audi A4 Premium
$33,175

Significant advantages of the A4 Premium (vs the Prius Four)

  • Optional rear air conditioning
  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Semi-independent

Significant disadvantages of the A4 Premium (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 22 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 37.4 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Much worse highway mileage: 30 mpg vs 48 mpg

common strengths of the A4 Premium and Prius Four

  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 30 mpg vs 48 mpg
  • Both have a continuously variable transmission for optimal fuel efficiency: Continuously variable vs Continuously variable
arrow Compare the 2011 Audi A4 Premium vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four

2011 BMW 328i

2011 BMW 328i
$37,475

Significant advantages of the 328i (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Semi-independent
  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 3 year

Significant disadvantages of the 328i (vs the Prius Four)

  • Much worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 51 mpg
  • Much wider turning radius: 36.1 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Much worse highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 48 mpg

common strengths of the 328i and Prius Four

  • Both vehicles can make tight turns: 36.1 ft vs 17.1 ft
  • Inexpensive: $37,475 vs $28,080
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
arrow Compare the 2011 BMW 328i vs the 2011 Toyota Prius Four