2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2010 Porsche 911 GT3 Competitors

$113-133k super car, designed & built in Germany 14 city / 20-21 hwy 247-371 mile range, gas engine
435 to 450 hp 231 cu. in. 6-cylinder

As well as being compared against other super cars and luxury cars, the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3 is also often compared to exotic cars, sports cars, full-size SUVs and cars. The 2010 Porsche 911 GT3's top rivals come from Porsche (such as the 911 Turbo and the 911 Carrera ) and Nissan (such as the GT-R Black Edition and the 370Z Touring)

compared to super car competitors

Generally, compared to other super car competitors the 911 GT3 is slightly more sluggish (7.1 lb/hp vs 6.0 lb/hp), is much less powerful (435 HP @ 7,600 RPM vs 550 HP @ 8,000 RPM), only has a naturally-aspirated engine (none vs twin turbocharger) and slightly slower 0-60 time (3.8 seconds vs 3.0 seconds).

2010 Porsche 911 Turbo

2010 Porsche 911 Turbo
$133,750

Significant advantages of the 911 Turbo (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • 911 Turbo 's Twin turbocharger increases power output: Twin turbocharger vs None
  • Significantly faster 0-60 mph time: 3.0 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
  • Significantly more powerful: 500 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the 911 Turbo (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • None found

common strengths of the 911 Turbo and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 911 Turbo vs the 911 GT3

2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore

2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore
$196,995

Significant advantages of the Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more powerful: 550 HP @ 8,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Sportier performance: 5.5 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp

Significant disadvantages of the Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • None found

common strengths of the Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2012 Audi R8 GT

2012 Audi R8 GT
$198,050

Significant advantages of the R8 GT (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more powerful: 560 HP @ 8,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Sportier performance: 6.0 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp

Significant disadvantages of the R8 GT (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • None found

common strengths of the R8 GT and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2012 Audi R8 GT vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2012 Nissan GT-R Black Edition

2012 Nissan GT-R Black Edition
$96,100

Significant advantages of the GT-R Black Edition (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more powerful: 530 HP @ 6,400 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • GT-R Black Edition's Twin turbocharger increases power output: Twin turbocharger vs None
  • Significantly faster 0-60 mph time: 2.9 seconds vs 3.8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the GT-R Black Edition (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • None found

common strengths of the GT-R Black Edition and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2012 Nissan GT-R Black Edition vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2010 Ferrari 458 Italia

2010 Ferrari 458 Italia
$230,675

Significant advantages of the 458 Italia (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more powerful: 578 HP @ 9,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Sportier performance: 5.3 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp

Significant disadvantages of the 458 Italia (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • None found

common strengths of the 458 Italia and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2010 Ferrari 458 Italia vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG

2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG
$187,450

Significant advantages of the SLS AMG (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more powerful: 563 HP @ 6,800 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the SLS AMG (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • None found

common strengths of the SLS AMG and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

compared to luxury car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the 911 GT3 compared to other luxury car competitors include: it is slightly sportier (7.1 lb/hp vs 12.7 lb/hp), is slightly more powerful (435 HP @ 7,600 RPM vs 345 HP @ 6,500 RPM), slightly faster 0-60 time (3.8 seconds vs 6.5 seconds), significantly higher top speed (193 mph vs 155 mph) and has optional roof rails (optional vs not available).

However, on average it doesn't have rear air conditioning (not available vs optional), is slightly less fuel efficient on the highway (21 mpg vs 25 mpg), costs more ($113,150 vs $63,375), has much fewer seats (2 vs 4) and has significantly fewer airbags (4 vs 6).

2010 Porsche 911 Carrera

2010 Porsche 911 Carrera
$78,750

Significant advantages of the 911 Carrera (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • More seats: 4 vs 2
  • Significantly cheaper: $78,750 vs $113,150
  • Moon roof comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the 911 Carrera (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • None found

common strengths of the 911 Carrera and 911 GT3

  • Both vehicles can hit high speeds: 180 mph vs 193 mph
  • Both provide sporty handling: 9.0 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Both vehicles have good 0-60 times: 4.8 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
arrow Compare the 911 Carrera vs the 911 GT3

2011 Porsche Panamera Turbo

2011 Porsche Panamera Turbo
$136,275

Significant advantages of the Panamera Turbo (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Optional rear air conditioning
  • Many more airbags: 7 vs 4
  • Many fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 607 miles vs 372 miles

Significant disadvantages of the Panamera Turbo (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Roof rails not available

common strengths of the Panamera Turbo and 911 GT3

  • Both cars have extraordinary top speeds for this class of vehicle: 188 mph vs 193 mph
  • Fairly powerful: 500 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Both provide sporty handling: 8.7 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
arrow Compare the Panamera Turbo vs the 911 GT3

2011 Cadillac CTS 3.6

2011 Cadillac CTS 3.6
$42,605

Significant advantages of the CTS 3.6 (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Much cheaper: $42,605 vs $113,150
  • Significantly fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 486 miles vs 372 miles

Significant disadvantages of the CTS 3.6 (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much lower top speed: 146 mph vs 193 mph
  • Roof rails not available
  • Significantly slower 0-60 mph time: 6.5 seconds vs 3.8 seconds

common strengths of the CTS 3.6 and 911 GT3

  • Both come standard with an entertainment system
arrow Compare the 2011 Cadillac CTS 3.6 vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG

2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG
$61,175

Significant advantages of the C63 AMG (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Many more airbags: 6 vs 4
  • Significantly cheaper: $61,175 vs $113,150

Significant disadvantages of the C63 AMG (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Roof rails not available

common strengths of the C63 AMG and 911 GT3

  • Both cars have extraordinary top speeds for this class of vehicle: 186 mph vs 193 mph
  • Fairly powerful: 451 HP @ 6,800 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Both provide sporty handling: 8.7 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 BMW Z4 sDrive35is

2011 BMW Z4 sDrive35is
$63,375

Significant advantages of the Z4 sDrive35is (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Significantly cheaper: $63,375 vs $113,150
  • Z4 sDrive35is's Twin turbocharger increases power output: Twin turbocharger vs None
  • : Semi-automatic transmission vs Manual transmission

Significant disadvantages of the Z4 sDrive35is (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Significantly lower top speed: 155 mph vs 193 mph
  • Roof rails not available

common strengths of the Z4 sDrive35is and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2011 BMW Z4 sDrive35is vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Audi A5 Premium

2011 Audi A5 Premium
$39,075

Significant advantages of the A5 Premium (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Optional rear air conditioning
  • Much cheaper: $39,075 vs $113,150
  • More seats: 4 vs 2

Significant disadvantages of the A5 Premium (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much lower top speed: 130 mph vs 193 mph
  • Sluggish performance: 17.4 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Much less powerful: 211 HP @ 4,300 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM

common strengths of the A5 Premium and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2011 Audi A5 Premium vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

compared to exotic car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the 911 GT3 compared to exotic car competitors include: it slightly higher top speed (193 mph vs 177 mph), costs less ($113,150 vs $196,450), slightly tighter turning radius (35.8 ft vs 40.4 ft), has optional roof rails (optional vs not available) and has standard CD player (standard vs not available).

However, on average it only has a naturally-aspirated engine (none vs twin turbocharger), has slightly fewer seats (2 vs 4), has a manual transmission (manual transmission vs semi-automatic transmission), doesn't have an unlimited miles basic warranty and doesn't have power outlets (not available vs standard).

2010 Ferrari California

2010 Ferrari California
$196,450

Significant advantages of the California (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Unlimited basic warranty

Significant disadvantages of the California (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more expensive: $196,450 vs $113,150
  • CD player not available
  • Roof rails not available

common strengths of the California and 911 GT3

  • Both vehicles can hit high speeds: 193 mph vs 193 mph
  • Inexpensive: $196,450 vs $113,150
  • Power steering availability
arrow Compare the 2010 Ferrari California vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Maserati GranTurismo

2011 Maserati GranTurismo
$140,200

Significant advantages of the GranTurismo (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • More seats: 4 vs 2
  • Unlimited basic warranty
  • : Semi-automatic transmission vs Manual transmission

Significant disadvantages of the GranTurismo (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Roof rails not available
  • Significantly wider turning radius: 40.4 ft vs 35.8 ft
  • More expensive: $140,200 vs $113,150

common strengths of the GranTurismo and 911 GT3

  • Very inexpensive: $140,200 vs $113,150
  • Power steering availability
  • Power windows availability
arrow Compare the 2011 Maserati GranTurismo vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2012 McLaren MP4-12C

2012 McLaren MP4-12C
$231,400

Significant advantages of the MP4-12C (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • MP4-12C 's Twin turbocharger increases power output: Twin turbocharger vs None
  • Significantly more powerful: 592 HP @ 7,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Power outlets comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the MP4-12C (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more expensive: $231,400 vs $113,150
  • CD player not available
  • Roof rails not available

common strengths of the MP4-12C and 911 GT3

  • Both vehicles can hit high speeds: 205 mph vs 193 mph
  • Power steering availability
  • Fantastic basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 50,000 mile
arrow Compare the 2012 McLaren MP4-12C vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Lotus Exige S260 Sport

2011 Lotus Exige S260 Sport
$76,075

Significant advantages of the Exige S260 Sport (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Exige S260 Sport's Supercharger increases power output: Supercharger vs None
  • Significantly cheaper: $76,075 vs $113,150

Significant disadvantages of the Exige S260 Sport (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much lower top speed: 150 mph vs 193 mph
  • Significantly less powerful: 257 HP @ 8,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Power steering not available

common strengths of the Exige S260 Sport and 911 GT3

  • Very inexpensive: $76,075 vs $113,150
  • Both vehicles can make tight turns: 32.8 ft vs 35.8 ft
  • Longer basic warranty: 36,000 mile vs 50,000 mile
arrow Compare the 2011 Lotus Exige S260 Sport vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S

2011 Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S
$139,100

Significant advantages of the Quattroporte Sport GT S (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • More airbags: 5 vs 4
  • Fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 452 miles vs 372 miles

Significant disadvantages of the Quattroporte Sport GT S (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Roof rails not available
  • Significantly wider turning radius: 40.4 ft vs 35.8 ft
  • Much shorter-lasting basic warranty: None vs 4 year

common strengths of the Quattroporte Sport GT S and 911 GT3

  • Very inexpensive: $139,100 vs $113,150
  • Power steering availability
  • Power windows availability
arrow Compare the 2011 Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

compared to sports car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the 911 GT3 compared to sports car competitors include: it is slightly more powerful (435 HP @ 7,600 RPM vs 305 HP @ 6,000 RPM), significantly faster 0-60 time (3.8 seconds vs 6.5 seconds), significantly higher top speed (193 mph vs 144 mph), is slightly sportier (7.1 lb/hp vs 11.1 lb/hp) and has optional roof rails (optional vs unknown).

However, on average it only has a naturally-aspirated engine (none vs turbocharger), is slightly less fuel efficient in the city (14 mpg vs 19 mpg), is slightly less fuel efficient on the highway (21 mpg vs 27 mpg), costs more ($113,150 vs $36,910) and gets significantly less from a tank of gas in the city (248 miles vs 330 miles).

2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI
$34,720

Significant advantages of the Impreza WRX STI (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Impreza WRX STI's Turbocharger increases power output: Turbocharger vs None
  • Significantly cheaper: $34,720 vs $113,150
  • Much more ground clearance for rough terrain: 5.9" vs 3.7"

Significant disadvantages of the Impreza WRX STI (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much lower top speed: 144 mph vs 193 mph
  • Significantly slower 0-60 mph time: 5.4 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
  • Less powerful: 305 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM

common strengths of the Impreza WRX STI and 911 GT3

  • Both come standard with leather interiors
  • Both cars offer an entertainment system for passengers, but it'll cost extra to get it on the {worse}
arrow Compare the 2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Chevrolet Corvette Z06

2011 Chevrolet Corvette Z06
$75,325

Significant advantages of the Corvette Z06 (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more cargo room: 22.4 ft3 vs 3.7 ft3
  • Fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 432 miles vs 372 miles
  • Power outlets comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Corvette Z06 (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Roof rails not available
  • Entertainment system not available
  • Premium radio not available

common strengths of the Corvette Z06 and 911 GT3

  • Both vehicles can hit high speeds: 190 mph vs 193 mph
  • Both vehicles have good 0-60 times: 4.3 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
  • Fairly powerful: 505 HP @ 6,300 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Nissan 370Z Touring

2011 Nissan 370Z Touring
$36,910

Significant advantages of the 370Z Touring (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Many fewer trips to fill-up when driving in the city: 342 miles vs 248 miles
  • Many fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 494 miles vs 372 miles
  • Better highway mileage: 26 mpg vs 21 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the 370Z Touring (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Significantly lower top speed: 155 mph vs 193 mph
  • Roof rails not available
  • Significantly shorter basic warranty: 36,000 mile vs 50,000 mile

common strengths of the 370Z Touring and 911 GT3

  • Both vehicles have good 0-60 times: 4.9 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
  • Both provide sporty handling: 9.9 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Both come standard with leather interiors
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan 370Z Touring vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Saab 9-3 Turbo4

2011 Saab 9-3 Turbo4
$32,505

Significant advantages of the 9-3 Turbo4 (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • 9-3 Turbo4's Turbocharger increases power output: Turbocharger vs None
  • Much more cargo room: 25.4 ft3 vs 3.7 ft3
  • Significantly better highway mileage: 27 mpg vs 21 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the 9-3 Turbo4 (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 8.2 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
  • Significantly less powerful: 210 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Roof rails not available

common strengths of the 9-3 Turbo4 and 911 GT3

  • Both come standard with leather interiors
  • Longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 50,000 mile
  • Longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 4 year
arrow Compare the 2011 Saab 9-3 Turbo4 vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Chevrolet Camaro SS

2011 Chevrolet Camaro SS
$31,920

Significant advantages of the Camaro SS (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Significantly fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 456 miles vs 372 miles
  • Significantly fewer trips to fill-up when driving in the city: 304 miles vs 248 miles
  • Significantly cheaper: $31,920 vs $113,150

Significant disadvantages of the Camaro SS (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Significantly lower top speed: 160 mph vs 193 mph
  • Slower 0-60 mph time: 5.1 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
  • Roof rails not available

common strengths of the Camaro SS and 911 GT3

  • Both vehicles have good 0-60 times: 5.1 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
  • Fairly powerful: 426 HP @ 5,900 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Both provide sporty handling: 9.1 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 MINI Cooper John Cooper Works

2011 MINI Cooper John Cooper Works
$35,000

Significant advantages of the Cooper John Cooper Works (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Cooper John Cooper Works's Turbocharger increases power output: Turbocharger vs None
  • Much better city mileage: 25 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Much better highway mileage: 33 mpg vs 21 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the Cooper John Cooper Works (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much lower top speed: 124 mph vs 193 mph
  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 6.5 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
  • Significantly less powerful: 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM

common strengths of the Cooper John Cooper Works and 911 GT3

  • Longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 50,000 mile
  • Longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 4 year
arrow Compare the 2011 MINI Cooper John Cooper Works vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

compared to full-size SUV competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the 911 GT3 compared to full-size SUV competitors include: it is slightly more fuel efficient in the city (14 mpg vs 12 mpg), is significantly more fuel efficient on the highway (21 mpg vs 17 mpg), is much sportier (7.1 lb/hp vs 14.5 lb/hp), much tighter turning radius (35.8 ft vs 41.3 ft) and significantly faster 0-60 time (3.8 seconds vs 5.8 seconds).

However, on average it has much less cargo space (3.7 ft3 vs 83.3 ft3), much less ground clearance (3.7" vs 9.1"), costs more ($113,150 vs $85,325), has much fewer seats (2 vs 7) and has much fewer airbags (4 vs 6).

2011 Mercedes-Benz GL550

2011 Mercedes-Benz GL550
$85,325

Significant advantages of the GL550 (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more ground clearance for rough terrain: 7.8" vs 3.7"
  • Much more cargo room: 83.3 ft3 vs 3.7 ft3
  • Child door locks comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the GL550 (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Sluggish performance: 14.5 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 17 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Significantly wider turning radius: 39.7 ft vs 35.8 ft

common strengths of the GL550 and 911 GT3

  • Fairly powerful: 382 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Both provide sporty handling: 14.5 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Fantastically long-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 4 year
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz GL550 vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Land Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged
$95,465

Significant advantages of the Range Rover Supercharged (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much more ground clearance for rough terrain: 9.1" vs 3.7"
  • Much more cargo room: 74.2 ft3 vs 3.7 ft3
  • Child door locks comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Range Rover Supercharged (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much wider turning radius: 41.3 ft vs 35.8 ft
  • Sluggish performance: 11.5 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Significantly slower 0-60 mph time: 5.8 seconds vs 3.8 seconds

common strengths of the Range Rover Supercharged and 911 GT3

  • Very powerful: 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Both cars are very sporty: 11.5 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Both cars have lightning fast acceleration: 5.8 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
arrow Compare the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

compared to car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the 911 GT3 compared to car competitors include: it is much sportier (7.1 lb/hp vs 19.7 lb/hp), is much more powerful (435 HP @ 7,600 RPM vs 170 HP @ 5,700 RPM), has a slightly longer-lasting basic warranty (4 year vs 3 year), has a slightly longer basic warranty (50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile) and has better traction (rear-wheel drive vs front-wheel drive).

However, on average it is significantly less fuel efficient in the city (14 mpg vs 30 mpg), is significantly less fuel efficient on the highway (21 mpg vs 35 mpg), costs more ($113,150 vs $19,950), has much fewer seats (2 vs 5) and has significantly fewer airbags (4 vs 6).

2011 Kia Optima LX

2011 Kia Optima LX
$19,950

Significant advantages of the Optima LX (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Many fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 648 miles vs 372 miles
  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Much cheaper: $19,950 vs $113,150

Significant disadvantages of the Optima LX (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Power windows not available
  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 9.2 seconds vs 3.8 seconds
  • Much less powerful: 200 HP @ 6,300 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM

common strengths of the Optima LX and 911 GT3

  • Longer-lasting basic warranty: 5 year vs 4 year
  • Longer basic warranty: 60,000 mile vs 50,000 mile
arrow Compare the 2011 Kia Optima LX vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Volkswagen Golf

2011 Volkswagen Golf
$18,765

Significant advantages of the Golf (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Much cheaper: $18,765 vs $113,150
  • Significantly better highway mileage: 33 mpg vs 21 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the Golf (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much lower top speed: 125 mph vs 193 mph
  • Much less powerful: 170 HP @ 5,700 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Power mirrors not available

common strengths of the Golf and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2011 Volkswagen Golf vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LT

2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LT
$18,240

Significant advantages of the Cobalt LT (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Much cheaper: $18,240 vs $113,150
  • Significantly better highway mileage: 33 mpg vs 21 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the Cobalt LT (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Worse brakes
  • Much less powerful: 155 HP @ 6,100 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Sluggish performance: 17.7 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp

common strengths of the Cobalt LT and 911 GT3

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LT vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2012 Fiat 500 Pop

2012 Fiat 500 Pop
$16,000

Significant advantages of the 500 Pop (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much better highway mileage: 38 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Much cheaper: $16,000 vs $113,150
  • Much better city mileage: 30 mpg vs 14 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the 500 Pop (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Sluggish performance: 23.4 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Much less powerful: 101 HP @ 6,500 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 9.7 seconds vs 3.8 seconds

common strengths of the 500 Pop and 911 GT3

  • Longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 50,000 mile
  • Longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 4 year
arrow Compare the 2012 Fiat 500 Pop vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Mazda 3 i Touring

2011 Mazda 3 i Touring
$19,745

Significant advantages of the 3 i Touring (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much tighter turning radius: 17.1 ft vs 35.8 ft
  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Much cheaper: $19,745 vs $113,150

Significant disadvantages of the 3 i Touring (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Sluggish performance: 19.7 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Much less powerful: 148 HP @ 6,500 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 9.4 seconds vs 3.8 seconds

common strengths of the 3 i Touring and 911 GT3

  • Optional CD changer
arrow Compare the 2011 Mazda 3 i Touring vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2011 Toyota Camry XLE

2011 Toyota Camry XLE
$30,605

Significant advantages of the Camry XLE (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Much cheaper: $30,605 vs $113,150
  • Many fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 536 miles vs 372 miles

Significant disadvantages of the Camry XLE (vs the 911 GT3 )

  • Much lower top speed: 135 mph vs 193 mph
  • Significantly less powerful: 268 HP @ 6,200 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM
  • Significantly slower 0-60 mph time: 7.1 seconds vs 3.8 seconds

common strengths of the Camry XLE and 911 GT3

  • Both provide sporty handling: 13.1 lb/hp vs 7.1 lb/hp
  • Both come standard with leather interiors
  • Let your passengers conveniently adjust their seat with the {better}'s power seats; requires an optional upgrade on the {worse}
arrow Compare the 2011 Toyota Camry XLE vs the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3