2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works Competitors

$32k sports car, designed & built in United Kingdom 25 city / 33 hwy 330-435 mile range, gas engine
208 hp 97 cu. in. 4-cylinder turbo

As well as being compared against other sports cars, the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works is also often compared to super cars, cars and luxury cars. The 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works's top rivals come from Nissan (such as the GT-R Black Edition and the 370Z ) and Ferrari (such as the 612 Scaglietti and the 599 GTB Fiorano )

compared to sports car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works compared to other sports car competitors include: it has a turbocharger to get maximum performance from the engine (turbocharger vs none), is significantly more fuel efficient in the city (25 mpg vs 13 mpg), is significantly more fuel efficient on the highway (33 mpg vs 20 mpg), costs less ($32,000 vs $140,200) and gets slightly more from a tank of gas in the city (330 miles vs 268 miles).

However, on average it doesn't have paddle shifters (not available vs standard), is significantly less powerful (208 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 440 HP @ 7,000 RPM), significantly longer braking distance from 60mph (128 ft vs 104 ft), is slightly more sluggish (13.6 lb/hp vs 9.3 lb/hp) and has significantly less spacious front seats (47.3 ft3 vs 54.6 ft3).

2011 Nissan 370Z

2011 Nissan 370Z
$33,510

Significant advantages of the 370Z (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 102 ft vs 128 ft
  • More powerful: 332 HP @ 7,000 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 51.6 ft3 vs 47.3 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the 370Z (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Significantly less cargo room: 6.9 ft3 vs 32.8 ft3
  • Worse highway mileage: 26 mpg vs 33 mpg

common strengths of the 370Z and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Inexpensive: $33,510 vs $32,000
  • Good city range: 361 miles vs 330 miles
  • Power steering availability
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan 370Z vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR

2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR
$34,770

Significant advantages of the Lancer Evolution GSR (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much roomier front seats: 54.6 ft3 vs 47.3 ft3
  • Many more airbags: 6 vs 4
  • Rear spoiler

Significant disadvantages of the Lancer Evolution GSR (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 23 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Significantly less cargo room: 6.9 ft3 vs 32.8 ft3
  • Worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 25 mpg

common strengths of the Lancer Evolution GSR and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Turbocharger vs Turbocharger
  • Inexpensive: $34,770 vs $32,000
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
arrow Compare the 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2010 Ferrari California

2010 Ferrari California
$196,450

Significant advantages of the California (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Paddle shifters comes standard
  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 100 ft vs 128 ft
  • Much more powerful: 453 HP @ 7,750 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the California (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Much more expensive: $196,450 vs $32,000
  • Much worse highway mileage: 19 mpg vs 33 mpg

common strengths of the California and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Power steering availability
arrow Compare the 2010 Ferrari California vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2012 Ford Mustang GT

2012 Ford Mustang GT
$34,105

Significant advantages of the Mustang GT (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 104 ft vs 128 ft
  • Significantly more powerful: 412 HP @ 6,500 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 52.2 ft3 vs 47.3 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the Mustang GT (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Rougher suspension: Live vs Independent
  • Worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 25 mpg

common strengths of the Mustang GT and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Inexpensive: $34,105 vs $32,000
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Number of rows of seating: 2 vs 2
arrow Compare the 2012 Ford Mustang GT vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2011 Maserati GranTurismo

2011 Maserati GranTurismo
$140,200

Significant advantages of the GranTurismo (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Paddle shifters comes standard
  • Much more powerful: 440 HP @ 7,000 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Passenger power seats comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the GranTurismo (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Much more expensive: $140,200 vs $32,000
  • Much worse highway mileage: 20 mpg vs 33 mpg

common strengths of the GranTurismo and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both have speed-sensitive volume
  • Power steering availability
arrow Compare the 2011 Maserati GranTurismo vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2010 Bentley Continental GTC Speed

2010 Bentley Continental GTC Speed
$237,695

Significant advantages of the Continental GTC Speed (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much more powerful: 600 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Paddle shifters comes standard
  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 103 ft vs 128 ft

Significant disadvantages of the Continental GTC Speed (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much more expensive: $237,695 vs $32,000
  • Much worse highway mileage: 17 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Much worse city mileage: 10 mpg vs 25 mpg

common strengths of the Continental GTC Speed and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Twin turbocharger vs Turbocharger
  • Power steering availability
arrow Compare the 2010 Bentley Continental GTC Speed vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

compared to super car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works compared to super car competitors include: it has a turbocharger to get maximum performance from the engine (turbocharger vs none).

However, on average it doesn't have paddle shifters (not available vs standard), is much more sluggish (13.6 lb/hp vs 6.0 lb/hp), is much less powerful (208 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 578 HP @ 9,000 RPM) and much longer braking distance from 60mph (128 ft vs 101 ft).

2012 Nissan GT-R Black Edition

2012 Nissan GT-R Black Edition
$96,100

Significant advantages of the GT-R Black Edition (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Sportier performance: 7.2 lb/hp vs 13.6 lb/hp
  • Much more powerful: 530 HP @ 6,400 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 101 ft vs 128 ft

Significant disadvantages of the GT-R Black Edition (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • None found

common strengths of the GT-R Black Edition and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both have an air compressor to maximize power output: Twin turbocharger vs Turbocharger
arrow Compare the 2012 Nissan GT-R Black Edition vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2010 Ferrari 612 Scaglietti

2010 Ferrari 612 Scaglietti
$315,538

Significant advantages of the 612 Scaglietti (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much more powerful: 532 HP @ 7,250 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Sportier performance: 7.8 lb/hp vs 13.6 lb/hp
  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 106 ft vs 128 ft

Significant disadvantages of the 612 Scaglietti (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger

common strengths of the 612 Scaglietti and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2010 Ferrari 612 Scaglietti vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2010 Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano

2010 Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano
$326,730

Significant advantages of the 599 GTB Fiorano (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much more powerful: 620 HP @ 7,600 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Sportier performance: 6.0 lb/hp vs 13.6 lb/hp
  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 105 ft vs 128 ft

Significant disadvantages of the 599 GTB Fiorano (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger

common strengths of the 599 GTB Fiorano and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2010 Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2010 Ferrari 458 Italia

2010 Ferrari 458 Italia
$230,675

Significant advantages of the 458 Italia (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Sportier performance: 5.3 lb/hp vs 13.6 lb/hp
  • Much more powerful: 578 HP @ 9,000 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 99 ft vs 128 ft

Significant disadvantages of the 458 Italia (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger

common strengths of the 458 Italia and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2010 Ferrari 458 Italia vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore

2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore
$196,995

Significant advantages of the Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Sportier performance: 5.5 lb/hp vs 13.6 lb/hp
  • Much more powerful: 550 HP @ 8,000 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 112 ft vs 128 ft

Significant disadvantages of the Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger

common strengths of the Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP 550-2 Bicolore vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2012 Audi R8 GT

2012 Audi R8 GT
$198,050

Significant advantages of the R8 GT (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Sportier performance: 6.0 lb/hp vs 13.6 lb/hp
  • Much more powerful: 560 HP @ 8,000 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Much shorter braking distance from 60mph: 100 ft vs 128 ft

Significant disadvantages of the R8 GT (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger

common strengths of the R8 GT and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2012 Audi R8 GT vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

compared to car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works compared to car competitors include: it is slightly sportier (13.6 lb/hp vs 17.5 lb/hp), has significantly more cargo space (32.8 ft3 vs 8.2 ft3), has a significantly longer-lasting basic warranty (4 year vs 3 year), has a significantly longer basic warranty (50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile) and has significantly more gears (6 vs continuously variable).

However, on average it lacks continously-variable transmission (traditional vs continuously variable), has significantly fewer airbags (4 vs 6), gets slightly less from a tank of gas in the city (330 miles vs 365 miles), gets slightly less from a tank of gas on the highway (436 miles vs 540 miles) and has slightly less spacious front seats (47.3 ft3 vs 51.3 ft3).

2012 Ford Fiesta SE

2012 Ford Fiesta SE
$16,295

Significant advantages of the Fiesta SE (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Power outlets comes standard
  • More airbags: 5 vs 4
  • Child door locks comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Fiesta SE (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Worse brakes
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Rougher suspension: Semi-independent vs Independent

common strengths of the Fiesta SE and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 37 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 29 mpg vs 25 mpg
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
arrow Compare the 2012 Ford Fiesta SE vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2011 Suzuki Kizashi Sport GTS

2011 Suzuki Kizashi Sport GTS
$26,264

Significant advantages of the Kizashi Sport GTS (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much tighter turning radius: 18.0 ft vs 36.1 ft
  • Has continuously variable transmission: Continuously variable vs Traditional
  • Better road traction: all-wheel drive vs front-wheel drive

Significant disadvantages of the Kizashi Sport GTS (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Many fewer gears: Continuously variable vs 6
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger

common strengths of the Kizashi Sport GTS and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Both offer an upgrade to a navigation system
arrow Compare the 2011 Suzuki Kizashi Sport GTS vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2012 Nissan Altima 3.5 SR

2012 Nissan Altima 3.5 SR
$29,190

Significant advantages of the Altima 3.5 SR (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Has continuously variable transmission: Continuously variable vs Traditional
  • Power outlets comes standard
  • Significantly fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 540 miles vs 436 miles

Significant disadvantages of the Altima 3.5 SR (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Many fewer gears: Continuously variable vs 6
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Significantly less cargo room: 8.2 ft3 vs 32.8 ft3

common strengths of the Altima 3.5 SR and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both provide sporty handling: 12.3 lb/hp vs 13.6 lb/hp
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Both offer an upgrade to a navigation system
arrow Compare the 2012 Nissan Altima 3.5 SR vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2011 Volkswagen GTI 2.0T

2011 Volkswagen GTI 2.0T
$31,095

Significant advantages of the GTI 2.0T (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Many more airbags: 6 vs 4
  • Significantly roomier back seats: 43.2 ft3 vs 32.3 ft3
  • Power outlets comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the GTI 2.0T (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Significantly shorter basic warranty: 36,000 mile vs 50,000 mile
  • Roof rails not available
  • Significantly shorter-lasting basic warranty: 3 year vs 4 year

common strengths of the GTI 2.0T and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 33 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Turbocharger vs Turbocharger
  • The {better}'s standard navigation system will ensure you never get lost again; optional upgrade required on the {worse}
arrow Compare the 2011 Volkswagen GTI 2.0T vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2011 Volkswagen Golf

2011 Volkswagen Golf
$18,765

Significant advantages of the Golf (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Power outlets comes standard
  • Significantly roomier back seats: 41.8 ft3 vs 32.3 ft3
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 51.3 ft3 vs 47.3 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the Golf (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Power mirrors not available
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Significantly shorter basic warranty: 36,000 mile vs 50,000 mile

common strengths of the Golf and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 33 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
arrow Compare the 2011 Volkswagen Golf vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

compared to luxury car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works compared to luxury car competitors include: it is much more fuel efficient in the city (25 mpg vs 11 mpg), is much more fuel efficient on the highway (33 mpg vs 17 mpg), costs less ($32,000 vs $89,575), gets significantly more from a tank of gas in the city (330 miles vs 204 miles) and gets slightly more from a tank of gas on the highway (436 miles vs 314 miles).

However, on average it is slightly more sluggish (13.6 lb/hp vs 10.9 lb/hp), has slightly fewer airbags (4 vs 5), is significantly less powerful (208 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 400 HP @ 5,500 RPM), has significantly less spacious front seats (47.3 ft3 vs 53.8 ft3) and has slightly less spacious back seats (32.3 ft3 vs 41.4 ft3).

2011 BMW 550i

2011 BMW 550i
$61,075

Significant advantages of the 550i (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Optional rear air conditioning
  • Power seats comes standard
  • Passenger power seats comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the 550i (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 22 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Much worse city mileage: 15 mpg vs 25 mpg
  • Roof rails not available

common strengths of the 550i and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • People mover: 5 vs 5
  • Both have an air compressor to maximize power output: Twin turbocharger vs Turbocharger
  • A standard folding rear seat on the {better} is a great way to free up space for road trips; requires optional upgrade on the {worse}
arrow Compare the 2011 BMW 550i vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2011 BMW 328i

2011 BMW 328i
$37,475

Significant advantages of the 328i (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Better road traction: all-wheel drive vs front-wheel drive
  • Optional power seats
  • Optional passenger power seats

Significant disadvantages of the 328i (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Much worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 25 mpg
  • Significantly less cargo room: 12.0 ft3 vs 32.8 ft3

common strengths of the 328i and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Inexpensive: $37,475 vs $32,000
  • Both vehicles can make tight turns: 36.1 ft vs 36.1 ft
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
arrow Compare the 2011 BMW 328i vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2011 Cadillac CTS 3.6

2011 Cadillac CTS 3.6
$42,605

Significant advantages of the CTS 3.6 (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Power seats comes standard
  • Passenger power seats comes standard
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 54.0 ft3 vs 47.3 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the CTS 3.6 (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Significantly worse city mileage: 18 mpg vs 25 mpg
  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 27 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Significantly less cargo room: 13.6 ft3 vs 32.8 ft3

common strengths of the CTS 3.6 and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 27 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $42,605 vs $32,000
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
arrow Compare the 2011 Cadillac CTS 3.6 vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2010 BMW M5

2010 BMW M5
$89,575

Significant advantages of the M5 (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much more powerful: 500 HP @ 7,750 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Power seats comes standard
  • Passenger power seats comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the M5 (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 17 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Much worse city mileage: 11 mpg vs 25 mpg
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack

common strengths of the M5 and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • People mover: 5 vs 5
  • A standard folding rear seat on the {better} is a great way to free up space for road trips; requires optional upgrade on the {worse}
arrow Compare the 2010 BMW M5 vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

2010 BMW M6

2010 BMW M6
$112,025

Significant advantages of the M6 (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much more powerful: 500 HP @ 7,750 RPM vs 208 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Power seats comes standard
  • Passenger power seats comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the M6 (vs the Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 17 mpg vs 33 mpg
  • Much worse city mileage: 11 mpg vs 25 mpg
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack

common strengths of the M6 and Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2010 BMW M6 vs the 2011 MINI Cooper Clubman John Cooper Works