2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Land Rover Range Rover Competitors

$79-95k full-size SUV, designed & built in United Kingdom 12 city / 18 hwy 331-496 mile range, gas engine
375 to 510 hp 305 cu. in. V8 supercharged

As well as being compared against other full-size SUVs and minivan and SUVs, the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged is also often compared to exotic cars, luxury cars and cars. The 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged's top rivals come from Mercedes-Benz (such as the G55 AMG and the S550) and Toyota (such as the 4Runner Limited and the Highlander SE)

compared to full-size SUV competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Range Rover Supercharged compared to other full-size SUV competitors include: it is much more powerful (510 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 352 HP @ 5,400 RPM), is much sportier (11.5 lb/hp vs 17.7 lb/hp), has slightly more airbags (6 vs 5), has slightly more spacious back seats (47.2 ft3 vs 38.2 ft3) and has a significantly longer-lasting basic warranty (4 year vs 3 year).

However, on average it has significantly less cargo space (74.2 ft3 vs 120.1 ft3), significantly less towing weight (1,164 lb vs 2,929 lb), costs more ($95,465 vs $55,520), has much fewer seats (5 vs 8) and gets slightly less from a tank of gas in the city (331 miles vs 364 miles).

2011 GMC Yukon Denali

2011 GMC Yukon Denali
$54,600

Significant advantages of the Yukon Denali (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Significantly more cargo room: 108.9 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Significantly higher towing capacity: 1,620 lb vs 1,164 lb
  • Much cheaper: $54,600 vs $95,465

Significant disadvantages of the Yukon Denali (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less powerful: 403 HP @ 5,700 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack

common strengths of the Yukon Denali and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Very powerful: 403 HP @ 5,700 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Both provide sporty handling: 14.0 lb/hp vs 11.5 lb/hp
  • Both come standard with navigation systems
arrow Compare the 2011 GMC Yukon Denali vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ

2011 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ
$55,520

Significant advantages of the Tahoe LTZ (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Significantly higher towing capacity: 1,705 lb vs 1,164 lb
  • Significantly more cargo room: 108.9 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Much cheaper: $55,520 vs $95,465

Significant disadvantages of the Tahoe LTZ (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less powerful: 320 HP @ 5,400 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger
  • Sluggish performance: 18.4 lb/hp vs 11.5 lb/hp

common strengths of the Tahoe LTZ and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both vehicles ride hide, good for off-roading: 9.1" vs 9.1"
  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: four-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Both come standard with navigation systems
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Toyota Sequoia Limited

2011 Toyota Sequoia Limited
$55,240

Significant advantages of the Sequoia Limited (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Significantly more cargo room: 120.1 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Much cheaper: $55,240 vs $95,465
  • More seats: 8 vs 5

Significant disadvantages of the Sequoia Limited (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less powerful: 381 HP @ 5,600 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger
  • Much shorter-lasting basic warranty: 3 year vs 4 year

common strengths of the Sequoia Limited and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Fairly powerful: 381 HP @ 5,600 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Both vehicles ride hide, good for off-roading: 10" vs 9.1"
  • Both provide sporty handling: 15.7 lb/hp vs 11.5 lb/hp
arrow Compare the 2011 Toyota Sequoia Limited vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Ford Expedition King Ranch

2011 Ford Expedition King Ranch
$50,650

Significant advantages of the Expedition King Ranch (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Significantly more cargo room: 108.3 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Significantly higher towing capacity: 1,590 lb vs 1,164 lb
  • Much cheaper: $50,650 vs $95,465

Significant disadvantages of the Expedition King Ranch (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less powerful: 310 HP @ 5,100 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger
  • Sluggish performance: 18.9 lb/hp vs 11.5 lb/hp

common strengths of the Expedition King Ranch and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: four-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Both come standard with leather interiors
  • Both have power seats for the passenger
arrow Compare the 2011 Ford Expedition King Ranch vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Mercedes-Benz GL550

2011 Mercedes-Benz GL550
$85,325

Significant advantages of the GL550 (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Number of rows of seating: 3 vs 2
  • More seats: 7 vs 5
  • Paddle shifters comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the GL550 (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less powerful: 382 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Significantly less ground clearance for rough terrain: 7.8" vs 9.1"
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger

common strengths of the GL550 and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Fairly powerful: 382 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Fantastically long-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 4 year
  • Both provide sporty handling: 14.5 lb/hp vs 11.5 lb/hp
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz GL550 vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 LT

2011 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 LT
$47,385

Significant advantages of the Suburban 2500 LT (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Many higher towing capacity: 2,929 lb vs 1,164 lb
  • Much more cargo room: 137.4 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Much cheaper: $47,385 vs $95,465

Significant disadvantages of the Suburban 2500 LT (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less powerful: 352 HP @ 5,400 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger
  • Sluggish performance: 17.7 lb/hp vs 11.5 lb/hp

common strengths of the Suburban 2500 LT and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Fairly powerful: 352 HP @ 5,400 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Both vehicles ride hide, good for off-roading: 9.1" vs 9.1"
  • Both have spacious back seats: 49.8 ft3 vs 47.2 ft3
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 LT vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

compared to minivan and SUV competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Range Rover Supercharged compared to other minivan and SUV competitors include: it has significantly more airbags (6 vs 4), is significantly sportier (11.5 lb/hp vs 17.2 lb/hp), gets slightly more from a tank of gas on the highway (497 miles vs 428 miles), is much more powerful (510 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 270 HP @ 5,600 RPM) and has slightly more spacious back seats (47.2 ft3 vs 34.5 ft3).

However, on average it has slightly less cargo space (74.2 ft3 vs 89.7 ft3), has 2 rows of seats (2 vs 3), is slightly less fuel efficient in the city (12 mpg vs 16 mpg), is slightly less fuel efficient on the highway (18 mpg vs 22 mpg) and costs more ($95,465 vs $39,275).

2011 Mercedes-Benz G55 AMG

2011 Mercedes-Benz G55 AMG
$125,325

Significant advantages of the G55 AMG (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Has a subwoofer

Significant disadvantages of the G55 AMG (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Significantly fewer airbags: 5 vs 6
  • Rougher suspension: Live vs Independent
  • Rougher suspension: Live vs Independent

common strengths of the G55 AMG and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both have electronic stability control
  • Very powerful: 500 HP @ 6,100 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Supercharger vs Supercharger
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz G55 AMG vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sahara

Placeholder
$31,245

Significant advantages of the Wrangler Unlimited Sahara (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much cheaper: $31,245 vs $95,465
  • Has a subwoofer
  • Significantly more ground clearance for rough terrain: 10.2" vs 9.1"

Significant disadvantages of the Wrangler Unlimited Sahara (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Many fewer airbags: 3 vs 6
  • Rougher suspension: Live vs Independent
  • Much less powerful: 202 HP @ 5,200 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM

common strengths of the Wrangler Unlimited Sahara and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both have electronic stability control
  • Both have good drivetrains for driving off-road or in poor weather: four-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Both have spacious back seats: 49.4 ft3 vs 47.2 ft3
arrow Compare the 2011 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sahara vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Toyota 4Runner Limited

2011 Toyota 4Runner Limited
$39,210

Significant advantages of the 4Runner Limited (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Number of rows of seating: 3 vs 2
  • More cargo room: 89.7 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Much cheaper: $39,210 vs $95,465

Significant disadvantages of the 4Runner Limited (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less powerful: 270 HP @ 5,600 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger
  • Only has four-wheel drive: two-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive

common strengths of the 4Runner Limited and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both have good airbag coverage: 6 vs 6
  • Both have electronic stability control
  • Both vehicles have good 0-60 times: 7.1 seconds vs 5.8 seconds
arrow Compare the 2011 Toyota 4Runner Limited vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Toyota Highlander SE

2011 Toyota Highlander SE
$34,660

Significant advantages of the Highlander SE (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Number of rows of seating: 3 vs 2
  • Significantly more cargo room: 95.4 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Much cheaper: $34,660 vs $95,465

Significant disadvantages of the Highlander SE (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less powerful: 270 HP @ 6,200 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger
  • Only has four-wheel drive: two-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive

common strengths of the Highlander SE and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both have good airbag coverage: 6 vs 6
  • Both have electronic stability control
  • Both provide sporty handling: 15.0 lb/hp vs 11.5 lb/hp
arrow Compare the 2011 Toyota Highlander SE vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Honda Pilot EX

2011 Honda Pilot EX
$31,980

Significant advantages of the Pilot EX (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Number of rows of seating: 3 vs 2
  • Much cheaper: $31,980 vs $95,465
  • More seats: 8 vs 5

Significant disadvantages of the Pilot EX (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Significantly fewer airbags: 5 vs 6
  • Much less powerful: 250 HP @ 5,700 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger

common strengths of the Pilot EX and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both have electronic stability control
  • Both have a smoother suspension than expected for this class of vehicle: Independent vs Independent
  • Power steering availability
arrow Compare the 2011 Honda Pilot EX vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2012 Volvo XC90 3.2

2012 Volvo XC90 3.2
$39,275

Significant advantages of the XC90 3.2 (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much cheaper: $39,275 vs $95,465
  • More seats: 7 vs 5
  • Better highway mileage: 22 mpg vs 18 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the XC90 3.2 (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Many fewer airbags: 4 vs 6
  • Much less powerful: 240 HP @ 6,400 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Sluggish performance: 19.8 lb/hp vs 11.5 lb/hp

common strengths of the XC90 3.2 and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 50,000 mile
  • Longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 4 year
  • Power steering availability
arrow Compare the 2012 Volvo XC90 3.2 vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

compared to exotic car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Range Rover Supercharged compared to exotic car competitors include: it has a supercharger to get maximum performance from the engine (supercharger vs none), costs less ($95,465 vs $189,095), has slightly more airbags (6 vs 4), gets slightly more from a tank of gas in the city (331 miles vs 229 miles) and gets slightly more from a tank of gas on the highway (497 miles vs 436 miles).

However, on average it significantly lower top speed (140 mph vs 177 mph), much worse cornering ability (0.65 g vs 0.9 g), doesn't have paddle shifters (not available vs standard), lacks rear spoiler and doesn't have an unlimited miles basic warranty.

2011 Rolls-Royce Ghost

2011 Rolls-Royce Ghost
$250,200

Significant advantages of the Ghost (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Significantly more gears: 8 vs 6
  • Unlimited basic warranty

Significant disadvantages of the Ghost (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much more expensive: $250,200 vs $95,465
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack
  • Moon roof not available

common strengths of the Ghost and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Twin turbocharger vs Supercharger
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 5 vs 6
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
arrow Compare the 2011 Rolls-Royce Ghost vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Maserati Quattroporte

2011 Maserati Quattroporte
$125,150

Significant advantages of the Quattroporte (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Quattroporte (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger
  • Less powerful: 405 HP @ 7,000 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Folding rear seats not available

common strengths of the Quattroporte and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Very inexpensive: $125,150 vs $95,465
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 5 vs 6
  • Good highway range: 476 miles vs 497 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Maserati Quattroporte vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2010 Bentley Continental GT

2010 Bentley Continental GT
$189,095

Significant advantages of the Continental GT (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much better cornering ability: 0.9 g vs 0.65 g
  • Much higher top speed: 195 mph vs 140 mph
  • Paddle shifters comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Continental GT (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack
  • Much more expensive: $189,095 vs $95,465
  • Moon roof not available

common strengths of the Continental GT and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Twin turbocharger vs Supercharger
  • Inexpensive: $189,095 vs $95,465
  • Good highway range: 452 miles vs 497 miles
arrow Compare the 2010 Bentley Continental GT vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Maserati GranTurismo

2011 Maserati GranTurismo
$140,200

Significant advantages of the GranTurismo (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Significantly higher top speed: 177 mph vs 140 mph
  • Paddle shifters comes standard
  • Unlimited basic warranty

Significant disadvantages of the GranTurismo (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Supercharger
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 229 miles vs 331 miles

common strengths of the GranTurismo and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Very inexpensive: $140,200 vs $95,465
  • Both offer a semi-automatic transmission, a nice perk for this class: Semi-automatic transmission vs Semi-automatic transmission
  • Both have speed-sensitive volume
arrow Compare the 2011 Maserati GranTurismo vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

compared to luxury car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Range Rover Supercharged compared to luxury car competitors include: it has standard rear air conditioning (standard vs optional), has much more cargo space (74.2 ft3 vs 13.2 ft3), is slightly more powerful (510 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 400 HP @ 6,500 RPM), has slightly more spacious front seats (54.3 ft3 vs 47.8 ft3) and has better traction (four-wheel drive vs rear-wheel drive).

However, on average it is slightly less fuel efficient in the city (12 mpg vs 16 mpg), is significantly less fuel efficient on the highway (18 mpg vs 24 mpg), gets slightly less from a tank of gas in the city (331 miles vs 405 miles), gets slightly less from a tank of gas on the highway (497 miles vs 634 miles) and has a slightly shorter-lasting basic warranty (4 year vs 5 year).

2011 Mercedes-Benz S550

2011 Mercedes-Benz S550
$98,525

Significant advantages of the S550 (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much better cornering ability: 0.87 g vs 0.65 g
  • Roomier back seats: 55.3 ft3 vs 47.2 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the S550 (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less cargo room: 16.4 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Only has four-wheel drive: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much less ground clearance for rough terrain: 5.7" vs 9.1"

common strengths of the S550 and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both cars can maintain different temperature zones with rear air conditioning, but it comes standard on the {better}
  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Both have spacious back seats: 55.3 ft3 vs 47.2 ft3
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz S550 vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Porsche Panamera 4S

2011 Porsche Panamera 4S
$95,675

Significant advantages of the Panamera 4S (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much better cornering ability: 0.92 g vs 0.65 g
  • Many higher towing capacity: 1,841 lb vs 1,164 lb
  • Significantly better highway mileage: 24 mpg vs 18 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the Panamera 4S (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less cargo room: 15.7 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Only has four-wheel drive: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Significantly more cramped front seats: 47.8 ft3 vs 54.3 ft3

common strengths of the Panamera 4S and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both cars can maintain different temperature zones with rear air conditioning, but it comes standard on the {better}
  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Both vehicles have above average towing capacity: 1,841 lb vs 1,164 lb
arrow Compare the 2011 Porsche Panamera 4S vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Jaguar XJL Supercharged

2011 Jaguar XJL Supercharged
$91,575

Significant advantages of the XJL Supercharged (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 5 year vs 4 year
  • Much better cornering ability: 0.86 g vs 0.65 g
  • Better highway mileage: 22 mpg vs 18 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the XJL Supercharged (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less cargo room: 15.2 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Only has four-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Leather not available

common strengths of the XJL Supercharged and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both can control front A/C separately from rear A/C
  • Fairly powerful: 470 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
arrow Compare the 2011 Jaguar XJL Supercharged vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Audi A8 L 4.2

2011 Audi A8 L 4.2
$84,875

Significant advantages of the A8 L 4.2 (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much better cornering ability: 0.95 g vs 0.65 g
  • Much better highway mileage: 27 mpg vs 18 mpg
  • Many fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 643 miles vs 497 miles

Significant disadvantages of the A8 L 4.2 (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much less cargo room: 13.2 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Only has four-wheel drive: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much less ground clearance for rough terrain: 4.7" vs 9.1"

common strengths of the A8 L 4.2 and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both cars can maintain different temperature zones with rear air conditioning, but it comes standard on the {better}
  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Good highway range: 643 miles vs 497 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Audi A8 L 4.2 vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

compared to car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Range Rover Supercharged compared to car competitors include: it is much sportier (11.5 lb/hp vs 23.8 lb/hp), has much more airbags (6 vs 3), has much more cargo space (74.2 ft3 vs 12.4 ft3), is much more powerful (510 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 108 HP @ 6,400 RPM) and has a significantly longer-lasting basic warranty (4 year vs 3 year).

However, on average it is significantly less fuel efficient in the city (12 mpg vs 27 mpg), is much less fuel efficient on the highway (18 mpg vs 35 mpg), lacks continously-variable transmission (traditional vs continuously variable), costs more ($95,465 vs $14,860) and gets slightly less from a tank of gas in the city (331 miles vs 407 miles).

2011 Subaru Outback 2.5i Limited

2011 Subaru Outback 2.5i Limited
$29,220

Significant advantages of the Outback 2.5i Limited (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Has continuously variable transmission: Continuously variable vs Traditional
  • Significantly better highway mileage: 29 mpg vs 18 mpg
  • Much cheaper: $29,220 vs $95,465

Significant disadvantages of the Outback 2.5i Limited (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Many fewer gears: Continuously variable vs 6
  • Much less powerful: 170 HP @ 5,600 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Power locks not available

common strengths of the Outback 2.5i Limited and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Lots of cargo room: 71.3 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Both have good drivetrains for driving off-road or in poor weather: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Both vehicles have above average towing capacity: 1,021 lb vs 1,164 lb
arrow Compare the 2011 Subaru Outback 2.5i Limited vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged

2011 Chevrolet Aveo LT

2011 Chevrolet Aveo LT
$14,860

Significant advantages of the Aveo LT (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Much better highway mileage: 35 mpg vs 18 mpg
  • Much better city mileage: 27 mpg vs 12 mpg
  • Much cheaper: $14,860 vs $95,465

Significant disadvantages of the Aveo LT (vs the Range Rover Supercharged)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: front-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much less cargo room: 12.4 ft3 vs 74.2 ft3
  • Much less powerful: 108 HP @ 6,400 RPM vs 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM

common strengths of the Aveo LT and Range Rover Supercharged

  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Aveo LT vs the 2011 Land-Rover Range Rover Supercharged