2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Honda CR-V LX Competitors

$22-23k mid-size SUV, designed & built in Japan 21 city / 27-28 hwy 321-428 mile range, gas engine
180 hp 146 cu. in. 4-cylinder 4 stars stability control, ABS, child door locks

As well as being compared against other mid-size SUVs and minivan and SUVs, the 2011 Honda CR-V LX is also often compared to luxury cars, sports cars and cars. The 2011 Honda CR-V LX's top rivals come from Acura (such as the RDX and the TSX ) and Toyota (such as the RAV4 and the RAV4 )

compared to mid-size SUV competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the CR-V LX compared to other mid-size SUV competitors include: it is slightly more fuel efficient on the highway (28 mpg vs 22 mpg), costs less ($22,705 vs $38,880), safer in side collisions for the rear passenger (5 stars vs 3 stars), slightly shorter braking distance from 60mph (123 ft vs 133 ft) and has standard power outlets (standard vs not available).

However, on average it is slightly less powerful (180 HP @ 6,800 RPM vs 555 HP @ 6,000 RPM), slightly less ground clearance (6.7" vs 7.5"), slightly less towing weight (850 lb vs 1,026 lb), lacks continously-variable transmission (traditional vs continuously variable) and has worse traction (two-wheel drive vs all-wheel drive).

2011 Acura RDX

2011 Acura RDX
$38,880

Significant advantages of the RDX (vs the CR-V LX)

  • RDX 's Turbocharger increases power output: Turbocharger vs None
  • Paddle shifters comes standard
  • Navigation system comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the RDX (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 22 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 133 ft vs 123 ft

common strengths of the RDX and CR-V LX

  • Good protection, only 10% to 20% chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 4 stars vs 4 stars
  • Both have speed-sensitive volume
arrow Compare the 2011 Acura RDX vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Toyota RAV4

2011 Toyota RAV4
$23,285

Significant advantages of the RAV4 (vs the CR-V LX)

  • More ground clearance for rough terrain: 7.5" vs 6.7"
  • Safer in side crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 3 stars
  • Number of rows of seating: 3 vs 2

Significant disadvantages of the RAV4 (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Less safe in side crashes for passengers in the rear: 3 stars vs 5 stars
  • Less safe in head-on crashes for the front passenger: 2 stars vs 3 stars
  • No speed sensitive volume

common strengths of the RAV4 and CR-V LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 28 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Both vehicles have above average braking abilities for this class of vehicle: 120 ft vs 123 ft
arrow Compare the 2011 Toyota RAV4 vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2012 BMW X5 M

2012 BMW X5 M
$87,275

Significant advantages of the X5 M (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much more powerful: 555 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 180 HP @ 6,800 RPM
  • Much more ground clearance for rough terrain: 8.3" vs 6.7"
  • Much faster 0-60 mph time: 4.5 seconds vs 9.2 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the X5 M (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 17 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Much more expensive: $87,275 vs $22,705
  • Much worse city mileage: 12 mpg vs 21 mpg

common strengths of the X5 M and CR-V LX

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2012 BMW X5 M vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Honda CR-V EX-L

2011 Honda CR-V EX-L
$28,905

Significant advantages of the CR-V EX-L (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Better road traction: four-wheel drive vs two-wheel drive
  • Leather comes standard
  • Moon roof comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the CR-V EX-L (vs the CR-V LX)

  • More cramped front seats: 52.9 ft3 vs 55.6 ft3

common strengths of the CR-V EX-L and CR-V LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 27 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 21 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Both vehicles have above average braking abilities for this class of vehicle: 123 ft vs 123 ft
arrow Compare the CR-V EX-L vs the CR-V LX

2011 Nissan Rogue S

2011 Nissan Rogue S
$23,510

Significant advantages of the Rogue S (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much more ground clearance for rough terrain: 8.3" vs 6.7"
  • Safer in side crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 3 stars
  • Has continuously variable transmission: Continuously variable vs Traditional

Significant disadvantages of the Rogue S (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Less cargo room: 57.9 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 137 ft vs 123 ft
  • More cramped back seats: 41.9 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3

common strengths of the Rogue S and CR-V LX

  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 26 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $23,510 vs $22,705
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan Rogue S vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Chevrolet Equinox LTZ

2011 Chevrolet Equinox LTZ
$29,380

Significant advantages of the Equinox LTZ (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Significantly more ground clearance for rough terrain: 7.8" vs 6.7"
  • Significantly higher towing capacity: 1,190 lb vs 850 lb
  • Many fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 602 miles vs 428 miles

Significant disadvantages of the Equinox LTZ (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 138 ft vs 123 ft
  • Wider turning radius: 40.0 ft vs 37.8 ft
  • Slower 0-60 mph time: 10.7 seconds vs 9.2 seconds

common strengths of the Equinox LTZ and CR-V LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 32 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Both have spacious back seats: 50.1 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Equinox LTZ vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

compared to minivan and SUV competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the CR-V LX compared to other minivan and SUV competitors include: it is much more fuel efficient in the city (21 mpg vs 13 mpg), is significantly more fuel efficient on the highway (28 mpg vs 18 mpg), costs less ($22,705 vs $52,325), has significantly more spacious back seats (48.2 ft3 vs 36.5 ft3) and has smoother suspension (independent vs live).

However, on average it has significantly fewer airbags (5 vs 6), has 2 rows of seats (2 vs 3), less safe in head-on collisions for the driver (4 stars vs 5 stars), has much fewer seats (5 vs 8) and is slightly more sluggish (18.8 lb/hp vs 16.6 lb/hp).

2011 Toyota Land Cruiser

2011 Toyota Land Cruiser
$69,730

Significant advantages of the Land Cruiser (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Many more airbags: 7 vs 5
  • Number of rows of seating: 3 vs 2
  • Much more powerful: 381 HP @ 5,600 RPM vs 180 HP @ 6,800 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the Land Cruiser (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 18 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Much worse city mileage: 13 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Much more expensive: $69,730 vs $22,705

common strengths of the Land Cruiser and CR-V LX

  • Both have a smooth suspension, quite rare in this class of vehicle: Independent vs Independent
  • Both have good brakes for high-performance use
  • Both have electronic stability control
arrow Compare the 2011 Toyota Land Cruiser vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Dodge Journey Mainstreet

2011 Dodge Journey Mainstreet
$25,280

Significant advantages of the Journey Mainstreet (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Number of rows of seating: 3 vs 2
  • Significantly more airbags: 6 vs 5
  • Sportier performance: 13.7 lb/hp vs 18.8 lb/hp

Significant disadvantages of the Journey Mainstreet (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Significantly worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Worse highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • No speed sensitive volume

common strengths of the Journey Mainstreet and CR-V LX

  • Good protection, only 10% to 20% chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 4 stars vs 4 stars
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 25 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Both have a smooth suspension, quite rare in this class of vehicle: Independent vs Independent
arrow Compare the 2011 Dodge Journey Mainstreet vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Audi Q7 Premium

2011 Audi Q7 Premium
$52,325

Significant advantages of the Q7 Premium (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Number of rows of seating: 3 vs 2
  • Q7 Premium's Turbocharger increases power output: Turbocharger vs None
  • Many fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 660 miles vs 428 miles

Significant disadvantages of the Q7 Premium (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Significantly worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Sluggish performance: 24.7 lb/hp vs 18.8 lb/hp
  • Much more cramped back seats: 29.2 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3

common strengths of the Q7 Premium and CR-V LX

  • Good protection, only 10% to 20% chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 4 stars vs 4 stars
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 25 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Both have a smooth suspension, quite rare in this class of vehicle: Independent vs Independent
arrow Compare the 2011 Audi Q7 Premium vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2012 Chevrolet Traverse LS

2012 Chevrolet Traverse LS
$30,240

Significant advantages of the Traverse LS (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Safer in head-on crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 4 stars
  • Safer in side crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 3 stars
  • Significantly more cargo room: 116.4 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the Traverse LS (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Significantly worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 24 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Power outlets not available

common strengths of the Traverse LS and CR-V LX

  • Good protection, only 10% to 20% chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 4 stars vs 4 stars
  • Great protection, only 5% chance of serious chest injuries in a crash: 5 stars vs 5 stars
  • Both have good brakes for high-performance use
arrow Compare the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse LS vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

compared to luxury car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the CR-V LX compared to luxury car competitors include: it is slightly more fuel efficient in the city (21 mpg vs 13 mpg), costs less ($22,705 vs $61,175), has slightly more seats (5 vs 4), has slightly more airbags (5 vs 4) and has much more cargo space (72.9 ft3 vs 13.1 ft3).

However, on average it is significantly more sluggish (18.8 lb/hp vs 10.0 lb/hp), is significantly less powerful (180 HP @ 6,800 RPM vs 414 HP @ 8,300 RPM), has a significantly shorter-lasting basic warranty (3 year vs 4 year), has a significantly shorter basic warranty (36,000 mile vs 50,000 mile) and has slightly fewer gears (5 vs 6).

2011 Acura TSX

2011 Acura TSX
$31,845

Significant advantages of the TSX (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Roof rails comes standard
  • Less chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 5 stars vs 4 stars
  • Significantly fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 555 miles vs 428 miles

Significant disadvantages of the TSX (vs the CR-V LX)

  • More cramped back seats: 41.1 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3

common strengths of the TSX and CR-V LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 30 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Lots of cargo room: 60.5 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
arrow Compare the 2011 Acura TSX vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 BMW M3

2011 BMW M3
$70,125

Significant advantages of the M3 (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much better cornering ability: 1 g vs 0.77 g
  • Much faster 1/4 mile time: 12.6 s s @ 113.4 mph mph vs 16.9 s s @ 82.9 mph mph
  • Much faster 0-60 mph time: 4.2 seconds vs 9.2 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the M3 (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 9.0 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Much more cramped back seats: 33.3 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3
  • Many fewer airbags: 3 vs 5

common strengths of the M3 and CR-V LX

  • Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
arrow Compare the 2011 BMW M3 vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG

2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG
$61,175

Significant advantages of the C63 AMG (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much faster 1/4 mile time: 12.4 s s @ 114.8 mph mph vs 16.9 s s @ 82.9 mph mph
  • Safer in side crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 3 stars
  • Much more powerful: 451 HP @ 6,800 RPM vs 180 HP @ 6,800 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the C63 AMG (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 12.4 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 19 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Much more cramped front seats: 49.0 ft3 vs 55.6 ft3

common strengths of the C63 AMG and CR-V LX

  • People mover: 5 vs 5
  • Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Audi TT

2011 Audi TT
$39,175

Significant advantages of the TT (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much better cornering ability: 0.95 g vs 0.77 g
  • Better road traction: all-wheel drive vs two-wheel drive
  • Significantly faster 0-60 mph time: 5.3 seconds vs 9.2 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the TT (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 13.1 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Much more cramped back seats: 26.2 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3
  • Much more cramped front seats: 47.7 ft3 vs 55.6 ft3

common strengths of the TT and CR-V LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 31 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $39,175 vs $22,705
arrow Compare the 2011 Audi TT vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

compared to sports car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the CR-V LX compared to sports car competitors include: it significantly shorter braking distance from 60mph (123 ft vs 142 ft), has much more cargo space (72.9 ft3 vs 16.2 ft3), has slightly more spacious back seats (48.2 ft3 vs 38.0 ft3), much more ground clearance (6.7" vs 4.5") and compensates for road noise.

However, on average it is slightly less powerful (180 HP @ 6,800 RPM vs 292 HP @ 6,350 RPM), much slower 0-60 time (9.2 seconds vs 5.9 seconds), significantly slower 1/4 mile time (16.9 s s @ 82.9 mph mph vs 14.3 s s @ 102.0 mph mph), significantly worse cornering ability (0.77 g vs 0.89 g) and is slightly more sluggish (18.8 lb/hp vs 14.3 lb/hp).

2011 Dodge Challenger R/T

2011 Dodge Challenger R/T
$30,720

Significant advantages of the Challenger R/T (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much faster 0-60 mph time: 5.9 seconds vs 9.2 seconds
  • Much better cornering ability: 0.89 g vs 0.77 g
  • Significantly faster 1/4 mile time: 14.3 s s @ 102.0 mph mph vs 16.9 s s @ 82.9 mph mph

Significant disadvantages of the Challenger R/T (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 142 ft vs 123 ft
  • Much less cargo room: 16.2 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Significantly worse city mileage: 15 mpg vs 21 mpg

common strengths of the Challenger R/T and CR-V LX

  • Both have lots of cargo room: 16.2 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Both have spacious front seats: 55.6 ft3 vs 55.6 ft3
  • Inexpensive: $30,720 vs $22,705
arrow Compare the 2011 Dodge Challenger R/T vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2012 Honda Civic Si

2012 Honda Civic Si
$22,975

Significant advantages of the Civic Si (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Significantly more gears: 6 vs 5
  • Sportier performance: 14.3 lb/hp vs 18.8 lb/hp
  • Moon roof comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Civic Si (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 11.7 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Much more cramped back seats: 31.9 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3
  • Significantly more cramped front seats: 50.7 ft3 vs 55.6 ft3

common strengths of the Civic Si and CR-V LX

  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 31 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $22,975 vs $22,705
arrow Compare the Civic Si vs the CR-V LX

2011 Dodge Charger

2011 Dodge Charger
$26,220

Significant advantages of the Charger (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Sportier performance: 13.6 lb/hp vs 18.8 lb/hp
  • Significantly fewer trips to fill-up when driving on the highway: 516 miles vs 428 miles
  • Power seats comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Charger (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 15.4 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Much less ground clearance for rough terrain: 5" vs 6.7"

common strengths of the Charger and CR-V LX

  • Both have lots of cargo room: 15.4 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Very roomy back seats: 49.2 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3
  • Good city range: 344 miles vs 321 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Dodge Charger vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 MINI Cooper Countryman

2011 MINI Cooper Countryman
$22,350

Significant advantages of the Cooper Countryman (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Roof rails comes standard
  • Significantly better city mileage: 28 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Significantly better highway mileage: 35 mpg vs 28 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the Cooper Countryman (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 41.3 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Sluggish performance: 24.4 lb/hp vs 18.8 lb/hp
  • Much less ground clearance for rough terrain: 4.5" vs 6.7"

common strengths of the Cooper Countryman and CR-V LX

  • Both very efficient in the city: 28 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 35 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Lots of cargo room: 41.3 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
arrow Compare the 2011 MINI Cooper Countryman vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

compared to car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the CR-V LX compared to car competitors include: it has much more cargo space (72.9 ft3 vs 20.6 ft3), has slightly more spacious front seats (55.6 ft3 vs 51.9 ft3), has slightly more spacious back seats (48.2 ft3 vs 39.9 ft3), has smoother suspension (independent vs semi-independent) and safer in side collisions for the rear passenger (5 stars vs 2 stars).

However, on average it is slightly less fuel efficient on the highway (28 mpg vs 33 mpg), less safe in head-on collisions for the driver (4 stars vs 5 stars), less safe in head-on collisions for the driver (3 stars vs 5 stars), less safe in side collisions for the driver (3 stars vs 5 stars) and significantly wider turning radius (37.8 ft vs 17.1 ft).

2011 Mazda 3 i Touring

2011 Mazda 3 i Touring
$19,745

Significant advantages of the 3 i Touring (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much tighter turning radius: 17.1 ft vs 37.8 ft
  • Safer in side crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 3 stars
  • Safer in head-on crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 4 stars

Significant disadvantages of the 3 i Touring (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 11.8 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Less safe in side crashes for passengers in the rear: 2 stars vs 5 stars
  • Much longer braking distance from 60mph: 145 ft vs 123 ft

common strengths of the 3 i Touring and CR-V LX

  • Inexpensive: $19,745 vs $22,705
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2011 Mazda 3 i Touring vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2012 Chevrolet Impala LT

2012 Chevrolet Impala LT
$27,995

Significant advantages of the Impala LT (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Sportier performance: 11.8 lb/hp vs 18.8 lb/hp
  • More seats: 6 vs 5
  • More powerful: 300 HP @ 6,500 RPM vs 180 HP @ 6,800 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the Impala LT (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 18.6 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Power outlets not available
  • Longer braking distance from 60mph: 135 ft vs 123 ft

common strengths of the Impala LT and CR-V LX

  • Both have spacious back seats: 48.2 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3
  • Both have spacious front seats: 56.6 ft3 vs 55.6 ft3
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
arrow Compare the 2012 Chevrolet Impala LT vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Honda Fit Sport

2011 Honda Fit Sport
$18,480

Significant advantages of the Fit Sport (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Better highway mileage: 35 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Better city mileage: 28 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Rear spoiler

Significant disadvantages of the Fit Sport (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 20.6 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Worse brakes
  • Rougher suspension: Semi-independent vs Independent

common strengths of the Fit Sport and CR-V LX

  • Inexpensive: $18,480 vs $22,705
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the Fit Sport vs the CR-V LX

2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LT

2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LT
$18,240

Significant advantages of the Cobalt LT (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Safer in head-on crashes for the front passenger: 5 stars vs 3 stars
  • Much more ground clearance for rough terrain: 13" vs 6.7"
  • Safer in side crashes for the driver: 4 stars vs 3 stars

Significant disadvantages of the Cobalt LT (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 13.9 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Worse brakes
  • Much more cramped back seats: 32.6 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3

common strengths of the Cobalt LT and CR-V LX

  • Inexpensive: $18,240 vs $22,705
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Both vehicles ride hide, good for off-roading: 13" vs 6.7"
arrow Compare the 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LT vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2012 Hyundai Elantra GLS

2012 Hyundai Elantra GLS
$15,945

Significant advantages of the Elantra GLS (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Significantly better highway mileage: 40 mpg vs 28 mpg
  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 5 year vs 3 year
  • Much longer basic warranty: 60,000 mile vs 36,000 mile

Significant disadvantages of the Elantra GLS (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Much less cargo room: 14.8 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Front air conditioning not available
  • Significantly more cramped back seats: 38.9 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3

common strengths of the Elantra GLS and CR-V LX

  • Both have spacious front seats: 56.4 ft3 vs 55.6 ft3
  • Inexpensive: $15,945 vs $22,705
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
arrow Compare the 2012 Hyundai Elantra GLS vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX

2011 Subaru Outback 2.5i

2011 Subaru Outback 2.5i
$23,920

Significant advantages of the Outback 2.5i (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Safer in side crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 3 stars
  • Better road traction: all-wheel drive vs two-wheel drive
  • Roof rails comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Outback 2.5i (vs the CR-V LX)

  • Power windows not available
  • Power locks not available
  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 136 ft vs 123 ft

common strengths of the Outback 2.5i and CR-V LX

  • Lots of cargo room: 71.3 ft3 vs 72.9 ft3
  • Both have spacious front seats: 57.2 ft3 vs 55.6 ft3
  • Both have spacious back seats: 48.2 ft3 vs 48.2 ft3
arrow Compare the 2011 Subaru Outback 2.5i vs the 2011 Honda CR-V LX