2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor Competitors

$45k regular-duty truck, designed & built in U.S.A. 11 city / 14 hwy 396-504 mile range, gas engine
411 hp 378 cu. in. V8 5.5' box 970 lb capacity

As well as being compared against other regular-duty trucks and truck and SUVs, the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor is also often compared to exotic cars, luxury cars, minivans, sports cars and cars. The 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor's top rivals come from BMW (such as the 750Li and the 335i) and Rolls-Royce (such as the Phantom and the Ghost )

compared to regular-duty truck competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor compared to other regular-duty truck competitors include: it is significantly more powerful (411 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 320 HP @ 5,400 RPM), is slightly sportier (15.1 lb/hp vs 18.6 lb/hp), has better traction (four-wheel drive vs two-wheel drive), safer in head-on collisions for the driver (4 stars vs 3 stars) and significantly faster 0-60 time (6.6 seconds vs 8.2 seconds).

However, on average it slightly less towing weight (970 lb vs 2,900 lb), is much less fuel efficient in the city (11 mpg vs 15 mpg), is much less fuel efficient on the highway (14 mpg vs 21 mpg), costs more ($45,695 vs $33,780) and has slightly fewer seats (5 vs 6).

2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab XL

2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab XL
$31,150

Significant advantages of the F150 SuperCrew Cab XL (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much better highway mileage: 23 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Much better city mileage: 17 mpg vs 11 mpg
  • Much cheaper: $31,150 vs $45,695

Significant disadvantages of the F150 SuperCrew Cab XL (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much less powerful: 302 HP @ 6,500 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 8.2 seconds vs 6.6 seconds
  • Only has four-wheel drive: two-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive

common strengths of the F150 SuperCrew Cab XL and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both have spacious back seats: 66.4 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Both vehicles' brakes will do well under heavy use
  • Both offer an upgrade to a navigation system
arrow Compare the F150 SuperCrew Cab XL vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Ford F250 Super Duty Crew Cab Lariat

2011 Ford F250 Super Duty Crew Cab Lariat
$42,640

Significant advantages of the F250 Super Duty Crew Cab Lariat (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Many higher towing capacity: 2,900 lb vs 970 lb
  • Less chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 4 stars vs 3 stars
  • Significantly more airbags: 6 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the F250 Super Duty Crew Cab Lariat (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: two-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Significantly wider turning radius: 53.5 ft vs 47.0 ft
  • No speed sensitive volume

common strengths of the F250 Super Duty Crew Cab Lariat and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Fairly powerful: 385 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Both have spacious back seats: 67.6 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
arrow Compare the F250 Super Duty Crew Cab Lariat vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Ram 1500 Crew Cab ST

2011 Ram 1500 Crew Cab ST
$33,780

Significant advantages of the 1500 Crew Cab ST (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much better highway mileage: 18 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Significantly better city mileage: 13 mpg vs 11 mpg
  • Significantly cheaper: $33,780 vs $45,695

Significant disadvantages of the 1500 Crew Cab ST (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Significantly less powerful: 310 HP @ 5,650 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Less safe in head-on crashes for the driver: 3 stars vs 4 stars
  • Leather not available

common strengths of the 1500 Crew Cab ST and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both have spacious back seats: 61.1 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: four-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Both vehicles' brakes will do well under heavy use
arrow Compare the 2011 Ram 1500 Crew Cab ST vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Chevrolet Avalanche LS

2011 Chevrolet Avalanche LS
$40,300

Significant advantages of the Avalanche LS (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much better highway mileage: 21 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Much better city mileage: 15 mpg vs 11 mpg
  • Roof rails comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Avalanche LS (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Significantly less powerful: 320 HP @ 5,400 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 8.9 seconds vs 6.6 seconds
  • Sluggish performance: 18.6 lb/hp vs 15.1 lb/hp

common strengths of the Avalanche LS and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: four-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
  • Both have electronic stability control
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche LS vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

compared to truck and SUV competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor compared to other truck and SUV competitors include: it is much more powerful (411 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 288 HP @ 6,300 RPM), is slightly sportier (15.1 lb/hp vs 18.4 lb/hp), gets slightly more from a tank of gas in the city (396 miles vs 316 miles), has significantly more spacious front seats (64.7 ft3 vs 57.6 ft3) and has much more spacious back seats (66.4 ft3 vs 36.9 ft3).

However, on average it significantly less towing weight (970 lb vs 1,705 lb), is much less fuel efficient in the city (11 mpg vs 17 mpg), is much less fuel efficient on the highway (14 mpg vs 23 mpg), has much fewer seats (5 vs 8) and has significantly fewer airbags (4 vs 6).

2011 Ford Expedition King Ranch

2011 Ford Expedition King Ranch
$50,650

Significant advantages of the Expedition King Ranch (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Significantly higher towing capacity: 1,590 lb vs 970 lb
  • More seats: 8 vs 5
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live

Significant disadvantages of the Expedition King Ranch (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Significantly less powerful: 310 HP @ 5,100 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Much more cramped back seats: 43.4 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 9.1 seconds vs 6.6 seconds

common strengths of the Expedition King Ranch and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both have a smooth suspension, quite rare in this class of vehicle: Independent vs Independent
  • Both have good brakes for high-performance use
  • Both have electronic stability control
arrow Compare the Expedition King Ranch vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Ford Explorer Limited

2011 Ford Explorer Limited
$38,360

Significant advantages of the Explorer Limited (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much better highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Much better city mileage: 17 mpg vs 11 mpg
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live

Significant disadvantages of the Explorer Limited (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much less powerful: 290 HP @ 6,500 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • CD player not available
  • Much more cramped back seats: 36.9 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3

common strengths of the Explorer Limited and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both have a smooth suspension, quite rare in this class of vehicle: Independent vs Independent
  • Both have good brakes for high-performance use
  • Both have electronic stability control
arrow Compare the Explorer Limited vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ

2011 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ
$55,520

Significant advantages of the Tahoe LTZ (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Many higher towing capacity: 1,705 lb vs 970 lb
  • Safer in head-on crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 4 stars
  • Much better highway mileage: 21 mpg vs 14 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the Tahoe LTZ (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Significantly less powerful: 320 HP @ 5,400 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Much more cramped back seats: 34.6 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Significantly slower 0-60 mph time: 8.4 seconds vs 6.6 seconds

common strengths of the Tahoe LTZ and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Fairly powerful: 320 HP @ 5,400 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Both have a smooth suspension, quite rare in this class of vehicle: Independent vs Independent
  • Great protection, only 5% chance of serious chest injuries in a crash: 5 stars vs 5 stars
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2012 GMC Acadia Denali

2012 GMC Acadia Denali
$44,690

Significant advantages of the Acadia Denali (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Safer in head-on crashes for the driver: 5 stars vs 4 stars
  • Much tighter turning radius: 40.4 ft vs 47.0 ft
  • More seats: 8 vs 5

Significant disadvantages of the Acadia Denali (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much less powerful: 288 HP @ 6,300 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Much more cramped back seats: 42.6 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Only has four-wheel drive: two-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive

common strengths of the Acadia Denali and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Great protection, only 5% chance of serious chest injuries in a crash: 5 stars vs 5 stars
  • Great protection, only 5% chance of serious chest injuries in a crash: 5 stars vs 5 stars
  • Both have good brakes for high-performance use
arrow Compare the 2012 GMC Acadia Denali vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2012 Ford Flex Limited

2012 Ford Flex Limited
$36,475

Significant advantages of the Flex Limited (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much better highway mileage: 24 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Much better city mileage: 17 mpg vs 11 mpg
  • Many more airbags: 6 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the Flex Limited (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much less powerful: 262 HP @ 6,250 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Much more cramped back seats: 37.9 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Only has four-wheel drive: two-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive

common strengths of the Flex Limited and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both have a smooth suspension, quite rare in this class of vehicle: Independent vs Independent
  • Both have good brakes for high-performance use
  • Both have electronic stability control
arrow Compare the Flex Limited vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2012 Lincoln MKT

2012 Lincoln MKT
$45,175

Significant advantages of the MKT (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much better highway mileage: 23 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Much better city mileage: 17 mpg vs 11 mpg
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live

Significant disadvantages of the MKT (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much less powerful: 268 HP @ 6,250 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Power steering not available
  • Much more cramped back seats: 31.4 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3

common strengths of the MKT and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both have a smooth suspension, quite rare in this class of vehicle: Independent vs Independent
  • Both have good brakes for high-performance use
  • Both have electronic stability control
arrow Compare the 2012 Lincoln MKT vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

compared to exotic car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor compared to exotic car competitors include: it costs less ($45,695 vs $385,000), gets significantly more from a tank of gas in the city (396 miles vs 286 miles), gets slightly more from a tank of gas on the highway (504 miles vs 454 miles), has an auxiliary audio input jack and has standard folding rear seats (standard vs not available).

However, on average it is significantly less powerful (411 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 563 HP @ 5,250 RPM), only has a naturally-aspirated engine (none vs twin turbocharger), slightly slower 0-60 time (6.6 seconds vs 5.1 seconds), significantly slower 1/4 mile time (15.2 s s @ 92.0 mph mph vs 12.9 s s @ 106.7 mph mph) and much lower top speed (100 mph vs 184 mph).

2011 Rolls-Royce Phantom

2011 Rolls-Royce Phantom
$385,000

Significant advantages of the Phantom (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Significantly higher top speed: 150 mph vs 100 mph
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Paddle shifters comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Phantom (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more expensive: $385,000 vs $45,695
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 290 miles vs 396 miles
  • Folding rear seats not available

common strengths of the Phantom and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Good highway range: 475 miles vs 504 miles
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
  • Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
arrow Compare the 2011 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Rolls-Royce Ghost

2011 Rolls-Royce Ghost
$250,200

Significant advantages of the Ghost (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Ghost 's Twin turbocharger increases power output: Twin turbocharger vs None
  • Much higher top speed: 155 mph vs 100 mph
  • Significantly more powerful: 563 HP @ 5,250 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the Ghost (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more expensive: $250,200 vs $45,695
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 283 miles vs 396 miles

common strengths of the Ghost and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • People mover: 5 vs 5
  • Child door locks come standard
  • Power steering availability
arrow Compare the 2011 Rolls-Royce Ghost vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2010 Maybach 62 Zeppelin

2010 Maybach 62 Zeppelin
$509,250

Significant advantages of the 62 Zeppelin (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • 62 Zeppelin's Twin turbocharger increases power output: Twin turbocharger vs None
  • Much more powerful: 631 HP @ 4,800 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Significantly more airbags: 6 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the 62 Zeppelin (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more expensive: $509,250 vs $45,695
  • Folding rear seats not available
  • Only has four-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive

common strengths of the 62 Zeppelin and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • People mover: 5 vs 5
  • Both have power outlets
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2010 Maybach 62 Zeppelin vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Bentley Mulsanne

2011 Bentley Mulsanne
$291,295

Significant advantages of the Mulsanne (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much higher top speed: 184 mph vs 100 mph
  • Mulsanne 's Twin turbocharger increases power output: Twin turbocharger vs None
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live

Significant disadvantages of the Mulsanne (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more expensive: $291,295 vs $45,695
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 278 miles vs 396 miles
  • Folding rear seats not available

common strengths of the Mulsanne and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
  • Good highway range: 455 miles vs 504 miles
  • Both have power outlets
arrow Compare the 2011 Bentley Mulsanne vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2010 Bentley Continental GT

2010 Bentley Continental GT
$189,095

Significant advantages of the Continental GT (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much higher top speed: 195 mph vs 100 mph
  • Continental GT's Twin turbocharger increases power output: Twin turbocharger vs None
  • Much better cornering ability: 0.9 g vs 0.7 g

Significant disadvantages of the Continental GT (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more expensive: $189,095 vs $45,695
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 286 miles vs 396 miles

common strengths of the Continental GT and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Inexpensive: $189,095 vs $45,695
  • Good highway range: 452 miles vs 504 miles
  • Both have power outlets
arrow Compare the 2010 Bentley Continental GT vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Aston Martin Rapide

2011 Aston-Martin Rapide
$211,610

Significant advantages of the Rapide (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much higher top speed: 188 mph vs 100 mph
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Paddle shifters comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Rapide (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more expensive: $211,610 vs $45,695
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 311 miles vs 396 miles
  • Folding rear seats not available

common strengths of the Rapide and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Good city range: 311 miles vs 396 miles
  • Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
  • Good highway range: 454 miles vs 504 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Aston-Martin Rapide vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

compared to luxury car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor compared to luxury car competitors include: it costs less ($45,695 vs $84,875), gets slightly more from a tank of gas in the city (396 miles vs 333 miles), is slightly more powerful (411 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 310 HP @ 6,500 RPM), has much more spacious front seats (64.7 ft3 vs 52.7 ft3) and has much more spacious back seats (66.4 ft3 vs 44.8 ft3).

However, on average it doesn't have rear air conditioning (not available vs optional), is significantly less fuel efficient in the city (11 mpg vs 17 mpg), is much less fuel efficient on the highway (14 mpg vs 27 mpg), is slightly more sluggish (15.1 lb/hp vs 12.1 lb/hp) and has significantly fewer airbags (4 vs 6).

2012 BMW 750Li

2012 BMW 750Li
$90,075

Significant advantages of the 750Li (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Rear air conditioning comes standard
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile

Significant disadvantages of the 750Li (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much more cramped front seats: 57.7 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 304 miles vs 396 miles

common strengths of the 750Li and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Very roomy back seats: 57.4 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Both have spacious front seats: 57.7 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Fairly powerful: 400 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
arrow Compare the 2012 BMW 750Li vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Lexus LS 460

2011 Lexus LS 460
$68,005

Significant advantages of the LS 460 (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Much tighter turning radius: 35.4 ft vs 47.0 ft
  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile

Significant disadvantages of the LS 460 (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much more cramped back seats: 44.8 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Much more cramped front seats: 56.2 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3

common strengths of the LS 460 and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both have spacious front seats: 56.2 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Good city range: 355 miles vs 396 miles
  • Good highway range: 533 miles vs 504 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Lexus LS 460 vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Mercedes-Benz S550

2011 Mercedes-Benz S550
$98,525

Significant advantages of the S550 (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Optional rear air conditioning
  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile
  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 3 year

Significant disadvantages of the S550 (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more cramped front seats: 54.2 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Only has four-wheel drive: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Significantly more expensive: $98,525 vs $45,695

common strengths of the S550 and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Very roomy back seats: 55.3 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Good highway range: 500 miles vs 504 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz S550 vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Audi A8 L 4.2

2011 Audi A8 L 4.2
$84,875

Significant advantages of the A8 L 4.2 (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Optional rear air conditioning
  • Much better highway mileage: 27 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile

Significant disadvantages of the A8 L 4.2 (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more cramped front seats: 52.7 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Only has four-wheel drive: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Significantly more cramped back seats: 56.1 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3

common strengths of the A8 L 4.2 and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Very roomy back seats: 56.1 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Good highway range: 643 miles vs 504 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Audi A8 L 4.2 vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2012 Audi A7 Premium

2012 Audi A7 Premium
$60,125

Significant advantages of the A7 Premium (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Rear air conditioning comes standard
  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Much better highway mileage: 28 mpg vs 14 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the A7 Premium (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more cramped front seats: 50.4 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Keyless entry not available
  • Much more cramped back seats: 43.8 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3

common strengths of the A7 Premium and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both will do well in poor weather or off-road conditions: all-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Good highway range: 554 miles vs 504 miles
  • Good city range: 356 miles vs 396 miles
arrow Compare the 2012 Audi A7 Premium vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 BMW 335i

2011 BMW 335i
$42,925

Significant advantages of the 335i (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Much better highway mileage: 28 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Much tighter turning radius: 36.1 ft vs 47.0 ft

Significant disadvantages of the 335i (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much more cramped front seats: 51.2 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Much more cramped back seats: 41.4 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3

common strengths of the 335i and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Inexpensive: $42,925 vs $45,695
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2011 BMW 335i vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

compared to minivan competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor compared to minivan competitors include: it has slightly more spacious front seats (64.7 ft3 vs 59.7 ft3), has much more spacious back seats (66.4 ft3 vs 44.5 ft3), gets much more from a tank of gas in the city (396 miles vs 340 miles), is much more powerful (411 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 283 HP @ 6,400 RPM) and has better traction (four-wheel drive vs front-wheel drive).

However, on average it has significantly fewer airbags (4 vs 6), higher risk of rolling over during emergency lane change (3 stars vs 4 stars), is much less fuel efficient in the city (11 mpg vs 17 mpg), is much less fuel efficient on the highway (14 mpg vs 25 mpg) and costs more ($45,695 vs $29,630).

2011 Dodge Grand Caravan Passenger Crew

2011 Dodge Grand Caravan Passenger Crew
$29,630

Significant advantages of the Grand Caravan Passenger Crew (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Less chance of rolling over during emergency lane change: 4 stars vs 3 stars
  • Much better highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Significantly more airbags: 6 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the Grand Caravan Passenger Crew (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more cramped back seats: 44.5 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Only has four-wheel drive: front-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • More cramped front seats: 59.7 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3

common strengths of the Grand Caravan Passenger Crew and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Fairly powerful: 283 HP @ 6,400 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Both provide sporty handling: 15.9 lb/hp vs 15.1 lb/hp
  • Good highway range: 500 miles vs 504 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Dodge Grand Caravan Passenger Crew vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

compared to sports car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor compared to sports car competitors include: it gets significantly more from a tank of gas in the city (396 miles vs 325 miles), has much more spacious front seats (64.7 ft3 vs 51.6 ft3), has much more spacious back seats (66.4 ft3 vs 48.8 ft3), has standard folding rear seats (standard vs not available) and has significantly more seats (5 vs 2).

However, on average it significantly slower 0-60 time (6.6 seconds vs 4.9 seconds), significantly slower 1/4 mile time (15.2 s s @ 92.0 mph mph vs 13.4 s s @ 105.2 mph mph), much lower top speed (100 mph vs 155 mph), much worse cornering ability (0.7 g vs 1.01 g) and is significantly less fuel efficient in the city (11 mpg vs 18 mpg).

2012 Hyundai Genesis 5.0 R-Spec

2012 Hyundai Genesis 5.0 R-Spec
$47,350

Significant advantages of the Genesis 5.0 R-Spec (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much better cornering ability: 0.83 g vs 0.7 g
  • Much tighter turning radius: 36.0 ft vs 47.0 ft
  • Much better highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 14 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the Genesis 5.0 R-Spec (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more cramped back seats: 48.8 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 325 miles vs 396 miles
  • More cramped front seats: 60.4 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3

common strengths of the Genesis 5.0 R-Spec and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Fairly powerful: 429 HP @ 6,400 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Very roomy front seats: 60.4 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Very roomy back seats: 48.8 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
arrow Compare the 2012 Hyundai Genesis 5.0 R-Spec vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Nissan 370Z Touring

2011 Nissan 370Z Touring
$36,910

Significant advantages of the 370Z Touring (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much better cornering ability: 1.01 g vs 0.7 g
  • Much higher top speed: 155 mph vs 100 mph
  • Significantly faster 1/4 mile time: 13.4 s s @ 105.2 mph mph vs 15.2 s s @ 92.0 mph mph

Significant disadvantages of the 370Z Touring (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Much more cramped front seats: 51.6 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 342 miles vs 396 miles
  • Folding rear seats not available

common strengths of the 370Z Touring and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Good city range: 342 miles vs 396 miles
  • Good highway range: 494 miles vs 504 miles
  • Both have power seats
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan 370Z Touring vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

compared to car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor compared to car competitors include: it gets slightly more from a tank of gas in the city (396 miles vs 325 miles), is slightly more powerful (411 HP @ 5,500 RPM vs 328 HP @ 7,000 RPM), has much more spacious front seats (64.7 ft3 vs 55.6 ft3), has much more spacious back seats (66.4 ft3 vs 44.8 ft3) and has better traction (four-wheel drive vs front-wheel drive).

However, on average it is slightly less fuel efficient in the city (11 mpg vs 17 mpg), is significantly less fuel efficient on the highway (14 mpg vs 29 mpg), is slightly more sluggish (15.1 lb/hp vs 11.3 lb/hp), has significantly fewer airbags (4 vs 6) and has a slightly shorter-lasting basic warranty (3 year vs 4 year).

2011 Infiniti G37 Sport

2011 Infiniti G37 Sport
$41,095

Significant advantages of the G37 Sport (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Much tighter turning radius: 35.4 ft vs 47.0 ft
  • Much better cornering ability: 0.89 g vs 0.7 g

Significant disadvantages of the G37 Sport (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much more cramped back seats: 41.2 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Much more cramped front seats: 55.2 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3

common strengths of the G37 Sport and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Both have spacious front seats: 55.2 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Fairly powerful: 328 HP @ 7,000 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
  • Both vehicles have good 0-60 times: 5.6 seconds vs 6.6 seconds
arrow Compare the 2011 Infiniti G37 Sport vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2012 Infiniti M56

2012 Infiniti M56
$59,975

Significant advantages of the M56 (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Much tighter turning radius: 36.7 ft vs 47.0 ft
  • Much longer basic warranty: 60,000 mile vs 36,000 mile

Significant disadvantages of the M56 (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much more cramped back seats: 44.8 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Significantly more cramped front seats: 58.7 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3

common strengths of the M56 and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Very roomy front seats: 58.7 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Both have spacious back seats: 44.8 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Very powerful: 420 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
arrow Compare the 2012 Infiniti M56 vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Chrysler 300 300C

2011 Chrysler 300 300C
$38,995

Significant advantages of the 300 300C (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Significantly better highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Many more airbags: 6 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the 300 300C (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much more cramped front seats: 55.6 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Much more cramped back seats: 50.7 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3

common strengths of the 300 300C and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Very roomy back seats: 50.7 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Both have spacious front seats: 55.6 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Fairly powerful: 363 HP @ 5,200 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
arrow Compare the 2011 Chrysler 300 300C vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Hyundai Equus Signature

2011 Hyundai Equus Signature
$58,900

Significant advantages of the Equus Signature (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Many more airbags: 7 vs 4
  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 5 year vs 3 year

Significant disadvantages of the Equus Signature (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much more cramped back seats: 49.7 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Significantly more cramped front seats: 59.7 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3

common strengths of the Equus Signature and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Very roomy front seats: 59.7 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Both have spacious back seats: 49.7 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Fairly powerful: 378 HP @ 6,500 RPM vs 411 HP @ 5,500 RPM
arrow Compare the 2011 Hyundai Equus Signature vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

2011 Toyota Avalon Limited

2011 Toyota Avalon Limited
$36,595

Significant advantages of the Avalon Limited (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Smoother suspension: Independent vs Live
  • Much better highway mileage: 29 mpg vs 14 mpg
  • Much tighter turning radius: 36.9 ft vs 47.0 ft

Significant disadvantages of the Avalon Limited (vs the F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor)

  • Only has four-wheel drive: front-wheel drive vs four-wheel drive
  • Much more cramped front seats: 55.2 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Much more cramped back seats: 51.7 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3

common strengths of the Avalon Limited and F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor

  • Very roomy back seats: 51.7 ft3 vs 66.4 ft3
  • Both have spacious front seats: 55.2 ft3 vs 64.7 ft3
  • Good city range: 370 miles vs 396 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Toyota Avalon Limited vs the 2011 Ford F150 SuperCrew Cab SVT Raptor