2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Chrysler 200 Competitors

$19-32k car, designed & built in U.S.A. 18-21 city / 29-31 hwy 304-523 mile range, gas or flex-fuel engine
173 to 283 hp 146 cu. in. 4-cylinder to 219 cu. in. V6

As well as being compared against other cars, the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX is also often compared to sports cars, luxury cars and mid-size SUVs. The 2011 Chrysler 200 LX's top rivals come from Chevrolet (such as the Impala LT and the Cruze LT) and Toyota (such as the Corolla and the Camry XLE)

compared to car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the 200 LX compared to other car competitors include: it has slightly more spacious front seats (55.4 ft3 vs 52.7 ft3), has smoother suspension (independent vs semi-independent), has better brakes (disc vs drum), slightly faster 0-60 time (6.4 seconds vs 8.3 seconds) and slightly shorter braking distance from 60mph (123 ft vs 135 ft).

However, on average it lacks continously-variable transmission (traditional vs continuously variable), only has a naturally-aspirated engine (none vs turbocharger), doesn't have moon roof (not available vs standard), doesn't have power seats (not available vs standard) and doesn't have leather (not available vs optional).

2012 Chevrolet Impala LT

2012 Chevrolet Impala LT
$27,995

Significant advantages of the Impala LT (vs the 200 LX)

  • Sportier performance: 11.8 lb/hp vs 19.6 lb/hp
  • More seats: 6 vs 5
  • Significantly more powerful: 300 HP @ 6,500 RPM vs 173 HP @ 6,000 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the Impala LT (vs the 200 LX)

  • Power outlets not available
  • Longer braking distance from 60mph: 135 ft vs 123 ft

common strengths of the Impala LT and 200 LX

  • Both have spacious front seats: 56.6 ft3 vs 55.4 ft3
  • Both have spacious back seats: 48.2 ft3 vs 45.0 ft3
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
arrow Compare the 2012 Chevrolet Impala LT vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Toyota Corolla

2011 Toyota Corolla
$16,660

Significant advantages of the Corolla (vs the 200 LX)

  • Better city mileage: 28 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Many more cupholders: 8 vs 4
  • Speed sensitive volume

Significant disadvantages of the Corolla (vs the 200 LX)

  • Power windows not available
  • Worse brakes
  • Power locks not available

common strengths of the Corolla and 200 LX

  • Inexpensive: $16,660 vs $19,995
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2011 Toyota Corolla vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2012 Chevrolet Cruze LT

2012 Chevrolet Cruze LT
$19,225

Significant advantages of the Cruze LT (vs the 200 LX)

  • Cruze LT's Turbocharger increases power output: Turbocharger vs None
  • More gears: 6 vs 4
  • More airbags: 6 vs 5

Significant disadvantages of the Cruze LT (vs the 200 LX)

  • Worse brakes
  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 139 ft vs 123 ft

common strengths of the Cruze LT and 200 LX

  • Inexpensive: $19,225 vs $19,995
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2012 Chevrolet Cruze LT vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Nissan Maxima SV

2011 Nissan Maxima SV
$35,210

Significant advantages of the Maxima SV (vs the 200 LX)

  • Has continuously variable transmission: Continuously variable vs Traditional
  • Sportier performance: 12.3 lb/hp vs 19.6 lb/hp
  • More powerful: 290 HP @ 6,400 RPM vs 173 HP @ 6,000 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the Maxima SV (vs the 200 LX)

  • Many fewer gears: Continuously variable vs 4

common strengths of the Maxima SV and 200 LX

  • Both have spacious front seats: 54.9 ft3 vs 55.4 ft3
  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 14.7 s s @ 99.0 mph mph vs 14.9 s s @ 94.9 mph mph
  • Both vehicles have good 0-60 times: 6.2 seconds vs 6.4 seconds
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan Maxima SV vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Volkswagen Jetta TDI

2011 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
$24,865

Significant advantages of the Jetta TDI (vs the 200 LX)

  • Significantly better highway mileage: 42 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Jetta TDI's Turbocharger increases power output: Turbocharger vs None
  • Significantly better city mileage: 30 mpg vs 21 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the Jetta TDI (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much more cramped front seats: 48.7 ft3 vs 55.4 ft3
  • Rougher suspension: Semi-independent vs Independent

common strengths of the Jetta TDI and 200 LX

  • Good highway range: 609 miles vs 507 miles
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2011 Volkswagen Jetta TDI vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Nissan Sentra

2011 Nissan Sentra
$16,820

Significant advantages of the Sentra (vs the 200 LX)

  • More gears: 6 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the Sentra (vs the 200 LX)

  • Worse brakes
  • Power mirrors not available
  • Rougher suspension: Semi-independent vs Independent

common strengths of the Sentra and 200 LX

  • Both have spacious front seats: 56.7 ft3 vs 55.4 ft3
  • Inexpensive: $16,820 vs $19,995
  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan Sentra vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

compared to sports car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the 200 LX compared to sports car competitors include: it is slightly more fuel efficient in the city (21 mpg vs 16 mpg), is slightly more fuel efficient on the highway (30 mpg vs 25 mpg), costs less ($19,995 vs $61,175), gets significantly more from a tank of gas in the city (355 miles vs 290 miles) and gets significantly more from a tank of gas on the highway (507 miles vs 409 miles).

However, on average it is significantly less powerful (173 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 370 HP @ 5,250 RPM), significantly slower 0-60 time (6.4 seconds vs 4.0 seconds), significantly slower 1/4 mile time (14.9 s s @ 94.9 mph mph vs 12.4 s s @ 114.8 mph mph), much lower top speed (120 mph vs 186 mph) and slightly worse cornering ability (0.82 g vs 0.91 g).

2011 Dodge Charger R/T

2011 Dodge Charger R/T
$31,220

Significant advantages of the Charger R/T (vs the 200 LX)

  • Significantly more powerful: 370 HP @ 5,250 RPM vs 173 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Significantly higher top speed: 155 mph vs 120 mph
  • Sportier performance: 11.5 lb/hp vs 19.6 lb/hp

Significant disadvantages of the Charger R/T (vs the 200 LX)

  • Significantly worse city mileage: 16 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Worse highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 306 miles vs 355 miles

common strengths of the Charger R/T and 200 LX

  • Both have spacious back seats: 49.2 ft3 vs 45.0 ft3
  • Good highway range: 478 miles vs 507 miles
  • Both have spacious front seats: 55.6 ft3 vs 55.4 ft3
arrow Compare the 2011 Dodge Charger R/T vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2012 Honda Civic Si

2012 Honda Civic Si
$22,975

Significant advantages of the Civic Si (vs the 200 LX)

  • Many more gears: 6 vs 4
  • Sportier performance: 14.3 lb/hp vs 19.6 lb/hp
  • Moon roof comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Civic Si (vs the 200 LX)

  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving on the highway: 409 miles vs 507 miles
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 290 miles vs 355 miles
  • Significantly more cramped back seats: 31.9 ft3 vs 45.0 ft3

common strengths of the Civic Si and 200 LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 31 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $22,975 vs $19,995
arrow Compare the 2012 Honda Civic Si vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG

2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG
$61,175

Significant advantages of the C63 AMG (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much higher top speed: 186 mph vs 120 mph
  • Paddle shifters comes standard
  • Much more powerful: 451 HP @ 6,800 RPM vs 173 HP @ 6,000 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the C63 AMG (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 19 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 226 miles vs 355 miles
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving on the highway: 331 miles vs 507 miles

common strengths of the C63 AMG and 200 LX

  • Both have a rear seat that folds down for extra storage space
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 6 vs 5
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Aston Martin Vantage

2011 Aston-Martin Vantage
$121,965

Significant advantages of the Vantage (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much more powerful: 420 HP @ 7,300 RPM vs 173 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Many more gears: 6 vs 4
  • Sportier performance: 8.6 lb/hp vs 19.6 lb/hp

Significant disadvantages of the Vantage (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 19 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Much worse city mileage: 13 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 274 miles vs 355 miles

common strengths of the Vantage and 200 LX

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2011 Aston-Martin Vantage vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2012 Hyundai Genesis 5.0 R-Spec

2012 Hyundai Genesis 5.0 R-Spec
$47,350

Significant advantages of the Genesis 5.0 R-Spec (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much more powerful: 429 HP @ 6,400 RPM vs 173 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Sportier performance: 9.4 lb/hp vs 19.6 lb/hp
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 60.4 ft3 vs 55.4 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the Genesis 5.0 R-Spec (vs the 200 LX)

  • Longer braking distance from 60mph: 136 ft vs 123 ft
  • Significantly worse city mileage: 16 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Worse highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 30 mpg

common strengths of the Genesis 5.0 R-Spec and 200 LX

  • Both have spacious front seats: 60.4 ft3 vs 55.4 ft3
  • Fantastic highway range: 508 miles vs 507 miles
  • Good city range: 325 miles vs 355 miles
arrow Compare the 2012 Hyundai Genesis 5.0 R-Spec vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 MINI Cooper Countryman

2011 MINI Cooper Countryman
$22,350

Significant advantages of the Cooper Countryman (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much more cargo room: 41.3 ft3 vs 13.6 ft3
  • Many more gears: 6 vs 4
  • Roof rails comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Cooper Countryman (vs the 200 LX)

  • Sluggish performance: 24.4 lb/hp vs 19.6 lb/hp
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving on the highway: 434 miles vs 507 miles

common strengths of the Cooper Countryman and 200 LX

  • Both very efficient in the city: 28 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Both very efficient on the highway: 35 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Fantastic city range: 347 miles vs 355 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 MINI Cooper Countryman vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

compared to luxury car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the 200 LX compared to luxury car competitors include: it is slightly more fuel efficient in the city (21 mpg vs 18 mpg), is slightly more fuel efficient on the highway (30 mpg vs 27 mpg), gets slightly more from a tank of gas in the city (355 miles vs 315 miles), gets slightly more from a tank of gas on the highway (507 miles vs 403 miles) and has slightly more spacious front seats (55.4 ft3 vs 53.1 ft3).

However, on average it lacks continously-variable transmission (traditional vs continuously variable), is significantly more sluggish (19.6 lb/hp vs 13.7 lb/hp), is slightly less powerful (173 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 263 HP @ 6,250 RPM), has a much shorter-lasting basic warranty (3 year vs 4 year) and has a much shorter basic warranty (36,000 mile vs 50,000 mile).

2011 BMW 328i

2011 BMW 328i
$37,475

Significant advantages of the 328i (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile
  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 3 year
  • Leather comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the 328i (vs the 200 LX)

  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving on the highway: 403 miles vs 507 miles
  • Worse city mileage: 17 mpg vs 21 mpg

common strengths of the 328i and 200 LX

  • Inexpensive: $37,475 vs $19,995
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
  • Child door locks come standard
arrow Compare the 2011 BMW 328i vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2012 Lincoln MKZ

2012 Lincoln MKZ
$35,520

Significant advantages of the MKZ (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile
  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 3 year
  • Leather comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the MKZ (vs the 200 LX)

  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 142 ft vs 123 ft

common strengths of the MKZ and 200 LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 27 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $35,520 vs $19,995
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
arrow Compare the 2012 Lincoln MKZ vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Cadillac CTS 3.6

2011 Cadillac CTS 3.6
$42,605

Significant advantages of the CTS 3.6 (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile
  • Much longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 3 year
  • Leather comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the CTS 3.6 (vs the 200 LX)

  • Power outlets not available

common strengths of the CTS 3.6 and 200 LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 27 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $42,605 vs $19,995
  • People mover: 5 vs 5
arrow Compare the 2011 Cadillac CTS 3.6 vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Audi A4 Premium

2011 Audi A4 Premium
$33,175

Significant advantages of the A4 Premium (vs the 200 LX)

  • Optional rear air conditioning
  • Has continuously variable transmission: Continuously variable vs Traditional
  • Much longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile

Significant disadvantages of the A4 Premium (vs the 200 LX)

  • Many fewer gears: Continuously variable vs 4
  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 140 ft vs 123 ft

common strengths of the A4 Premium and 200 LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 30 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $33,175 vs $19,995
arrow Compare the 2011 Audi A4 Premium vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

compared to mid-size SUV competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the 200 LX compared to mid-size SUV competitors include: it is slightly more fuel efficient on the highway (30 mpg vs 22 mpg), gets slightly more from a tank of gas in the city (355 miles vs 313 miles), gets significantly more from a tank of gas on the highway (507 miles vs 429 miles), has slightly more spacious front seats (55.4 ft3 vs 52.3 ft3) and has smoother suspension (independent vs live).

However, on average it has much less cargo space (13.6 ft3 vs 60.9 ft3), has slightly less spacious back seats (45.0 ft3 vs 49.1 ft3), doesn't have roof rails (not available vs standard), doesn't have power seats (not available vs standard) and doesn't have passenger power seats (not available vs standard).

2011 Jeep Patriot Latitude X

2011 Jeep Patriot Latitude X
$22,945

Significant advantages of the Patriot Latitude X (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much more cargo room: 54.2 ft3 vs 13.6 ft3
  • Roof rails comes standard
  • Leather comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Patriot Latitude X (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much longer braking distance from 60mph: 142 ft vs 123 ft
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving on the highway: 381 miles vs 507 miles
  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 9.6 seconds vs 6.4 seconds

common strengths of the Patriot Latitude X and 200 LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 28 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 23 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Inexpensive: $22,945 vs $19,995
arrow Compare the 2011 Jeep Patriot Latitude X vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2012 Ford Escape XLT

2012 Ford Escape XLT
$25,495

Significant advantages of the Escape XLT (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much more cargo room: 66.3 ft3 vs 13.6 ft3
  • Roof rails comes standard
  • Power seats comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Escape XLT (vs the 200 LX)

  • Worse brakes
  • Much longer braking distance from 60mph: 147 ft vs 123 ft
  • Much slower 0-60 mph time: 10.7 seconds vs 6.4 seconds

common strengths of the Escape XLT and 200 LX

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 28 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 21 mpg vs 21 mpg
  • Good highway range: 490 miles vs 507 miles
arrow Compare the 2012 Ford Escape XLT vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX

2011 Jeep Liberty Limited Edition

2011 Jeep Liberty Limited Edition
$27,445

Significant advantages of the Liberty Limited Edition (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much more cargo room: 60.9 ft3 vs 13.6 ft3
  • Roof rails comes standard
  • Leather comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the Liberty Limited Edition (vs the 200 LX)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 22 mpg vs 30 mpg
  • Much longer braking distance from 60mph: 150 ft vs 123 ft
  • Rougher suspension: Live vs Independent

common strengths of the Liberty Limited Edition and 200 LX

  • Both vehicles can make tight turns: 35.5 ft vs 36.5 ft
arrow Compare the 2011 Jeep Liberty Limited Edition vs the 2011 Chrysler 200 LX