2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Audi TT TTS Competitors

$50k roadster, designed in Germany, built in Hungary 22 city / 31 hwy 347-489 mile range, gas engine
265 hp 122 cu. in. 4-cylinder turbo 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph 0-60 in 5.2 seconds, maximum lateral acceleration 0.95 g

As well as being compared against other roadsters, sports cars and luxury cars, the 2011 Audi TT TTS is also often compared to super cars, mid-size SUVs and cars. The 2011 Audi TT TTS's top rivals come from Porsche (such as the Boxster and the 911 Carrera ) and BMW (such as the Z4 sDrive35is and the M3 )

compared to roadster competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the TT TTS compared to other roadster competitors include: it has a turbocharger to get maximum performance from the engine (turbocharger vs none), is slightly more fuel efficient in the city (22 mpg vs 17 mpg), is significantly more fuel efficient on the highway (31 mpg vs 24 mpg), costs less ($50,875 vs $104,775) and gets significantly more from a tank of gas in the city (348 miles vs 268 miles).

However, on average it has slightly less spacious front seats (47.6 ft3 vs 50.5 ft3), has significantly fewer gears (6 vs 7), slightly wider turning radius (35.9 ft vs 30.8 ft) and doesn't have entertainment system (not available vs optional).

2011 Porsche Boxster

2011 Porsche Boxster
$49,050

Significant advantages of the Boxster (vs the TT TTS)

  • Optional entertainment system

Significant disadvantages of the Boxster (vs the TT TTS)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • : Manual transmission vs Semi-automatic transmission
  • Only has all-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs all-wheel drive

common strengths of the Boxster and TT TTS

  • Good city range: 321 miles vs 348 miles
  • Good highway range: 456 miles vs 490 miles
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 4 vs 4
arrow Compare the 2011 Porsche Boxster vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 BMW Z4 sDrive35is

2011 BMW Z4 sDrive35is
$63,375

Significant advantages of the Z4 sDrive35is (vs the TT TTS)

  • Many more gears: 7 vs 6
  • Roomier front seats: 50.9 ft3 vs 47.6 ft3
  • Optional entertainment system

Significant disadvantages of the Z4 sDrive35is (vs the TT TTS)

  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving in the city: 246 miles vs 348 miles
  • Many more trips to the pumps when driving on the highway: 348 miles vs 490 miles
  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 24 mpg vs 31 mpg

common strengths of the Z4 sDrive35is and TT TTS

  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Twin turbocharger vs Turbocharger
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 4 vs 4
  • Both have electronic stability control
arrow Compare the 2011 BMW Z4 sDrive35is vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Mercedes-Benz SLK350

2011 Mercedes-Benz SLK350
$54,175

Significant advantages of the SLK350 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Many more gears: 7 vs 6
  • Optional entertainment system

Significant disadvantages of the SLK350 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 25 mpg vs 31 mpg
  • Paddle shifters not available

common strengths of the SLK350 and TT TTS

  • Fantastic city range: 352 miles vs 348 miles
  • Good highway range: 462 miles vs 490 miles
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 4 vs 4
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz SLK350 vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Mazda Miata MX-5 Grand Touring (Hard Top)

2011 Mazda Miata MX-5 Grand Touring (Hard Top)
$30,445

Significant advantages of the Miata MX-5 Grand Touring (Hard Top) (vs the TT TTS)

  • Significantly tighter turning radius: 30.8 ft vs 35.9 ft

Significant disadvantages of the Miata MX-5 Grand Touring (Hard Top) (vs the TT TTS)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Significantly worse cornering ability: 0.86 g vs 0.95 g
  • Slower 1/4 mile time: 15.4 s s @ 91.0 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph

common strengths of the Miata MX-5 Grand Touring (Hard Top) and TT TTS

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 28 mpg vs 31 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 21 mpg vs 22 mpg
  • Both come standard with leather interiors
arrow Compare the 2011 Mazda Miata MX-5 Grand Touring (Hard Top) vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Mercedes-Benz SL550

2011 Mercedes-Benz SL550
$104,775

Significant advantages of the SL550 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Many more gears: 7 vs 6
  • Significantly more cargo room: 12.0 ft3 vs 8.8 ft3
  • Roomier front seats: 50.5 ft3 vs 47.6 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the SL550 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Longer braking distance from 60mph: 126 ft vs 115 ft
  • Much worse highway mileage: 22 mpg vs 31 mpg

common strengths of the SL550 and TT TTS

  • Both have lots of cargo room: 12.0 ft3 vs 8.8 ft3
  • Good highway range: 464 miles vs 490 miles
  • Both have good airbag coverage: 4 vs 4
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL550 vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2010 Ferrari California

2010 Ferrari California
$196,450

Significant advantages of the California (vs the TT TTS)

  • Significantly shorter braking distance from 60mph: 100 ft vs 115 ft
  • Significantly higher top speed: 193 mph vs 155 mph
  • Significantly more powerful: 453 HP @ 7,750 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the California (vs the TT TTS)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Much worse highway mileage: 19 mpg vs 31 mpg
  • Much worse city mileage: 13 mpg vs 22 mpg

common strengths of the California and TT TTS

  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 11.9 s s @ 117.0 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
  • Both have lots of cargo room: 12.0 ft3 vs 8.8 ft3
  • Both have electronic stability control
arrow Compare the 2010 Ferrari California vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

compared to sports car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the TT TTS compared to other sports car competitors include: it has standard paddle shifters (standard vs not available), has a turbocharger to get maximum performance from the engine (turbocharger vs none), is significantly more fuel efficient in the city (22 mpg vs 16 mpg), is significantly more fuel efficient on the highway (31 mpg vs 24 mpg) and gets significantly more from a tank of gas in the city (348 miles vs 272 miles).

However, on average it is slightly less powerful (265 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 412 HP @ 6,500 RPM), is slightly more sluggish (12.8 lb/hp vs 8.7 lb/hp), has slightly less spacious front seats (47.6 ft3 vs 51.9 ft3), doesn't have roof rails (not available vs optional) and doesn't have folding rear seats (not available vs standard).

2010 Porsche 911 Carrera

2010 Porsche 911 Carrera
$78,750

Significant advantages of the 911 Carrera (vs the TT TTS)

  • Higher top speed: 180 mph vs 155 mph
  • Optional roof rails
  • Sportier performance: 9.0 lb/hp vs 12.8 lb/hp

Significant disadvantages of the 911 Carrera (vs the TT TTS)

  • Paddle shifters not available
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack

common strengths of the 911 Carrera and TT TTS

  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 13.0 s s @ 108.1 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
  • Both come standard with leather interiors
  • Both have rear spoilers
arrow Compare the 2010 Porsche 911 Carrera vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Chevrolet Camaro SS

2011 Chevrolet Camaro SS
$31,920

Significant advantages of the Camaro SS (vs the TT TTS)

  • Significantly more powerful: 426 HP @ 5,900 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 52.2 ft3 vs 47.6 ft3
  • Sportier performance: 9.1 lb/hp vs 12.8 lb/hp

Significant disadvantages of the Camaro SS (vs the TT TTS)

  • Paddle shifters not available
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 129 ft vs 115 ft

common strengths of the Camaro SS and TT TTS

  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 13.6 s s @ 108.0 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
  • Good highway range: 456 miles vs 490 miles
  • Both have power seats
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 BMW M3

2011 BMW M3
$70,125

Significant advantages of the M3 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Significantly more powerful: 414 HP @ 8,300 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Folding rear seats comes standard
  • Number of rows of seating: 2 vs 1

Significant disadvantages of the M3 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Paddle shifters not available
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Much worse highway mileage: 20 mpg vs 31 mpg

common strengths of the M3 and TT TTS

  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 12.6 s s @ 113.4 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability: 1 g vs 0.95 g
  • Both have power seats for the passenger
arrow Compare the 2011 BMW M3 vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Nissan 370Z Touring

2011 Nissan 370Z Touring
$36,910

Significant advantages of the 370Z Touring (vs the TT TTS)

  • Shorter braking distance from 60mph: 102 ft vs 115 ft
  • Better cornering ability: 1.01 g vs 0.95 g
  • Significantly tighter turning radius: 32.8 ft vs 35.9 ft

Significant disadvantages of the 370Z Touring (vs the TT TTS)

  • Paddle shifters not available
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Worse highway mileage: 26 mpg vs 31 mpg

common strengths of the 370Z Touring and TT TTS

  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability: 1.01 g vs 0.95 g
  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 13.4 s s @ 105.2 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
  • Good city range: 342 miles vs 348 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Nissan 370Z Touring vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2012 Ford Mustang GT

2012 Ford Mustang GT
$30,105

Significant advantages of the Mustang GT (vs the TT TTS)

  • Significantly more powerful: 412 HP @ 6,500 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Sportier performance: 8.7 lb/hp vs 12.8 lb/hp
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 52.2 ft3 vs 47.6 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the Mustang GT (vs the TT TTS)

  • Paddle shifters not available
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Worse cornering ability: 0.88 g vs 0.95 g

common strengths of the Mustang GT and TT TTS

  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 12.7 s s @ 111.3 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
  • Both have rear spoilers
  • Both have power outlets
arrow Compare the 2012 Ford Mustang GT vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Chevrolet Corvette Z06

2011 Chevrolet Corvette Z06
$75,325

Significant advantages of the Corvette Z06 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Much more powerful: 505 HP @ 6,300 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Much better cornering ability: 1.07 g vs 0.95 g
  • Significantly higher top speed: 190 mph vs 155 mph

Significant disadvantages of the Corvette Z06 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Paddle shifters not available
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Significantly worse city mileage: 15 mpg vs 22 mpg

common strengths of the Corvette Z06 and TT TTS

  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability: 1.07 g vs 0.95 g
  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 12.3 s s @ 122.0 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
  • Both have power seats
arrow Compare the 2011 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

compared to luxury car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the TT TTS compared to other luxury car competitors include: it is slightly more fuel efficient in the city (22 mpg vs 16 mpg), is slightly more fuel efficient on the highway (31 mpg vs 22 mpg), costs less ($50,875 vs $104,375), gets slightly more from a tank of gas in the city (348 miles vs 257 miles) and gets slightly more from a tank of gas on the highway (490 miles vs 376 miles).

However, on average it has significantly fewer seats (2 vs 4), is slightly more sluggish (12.8 lb/hp vs 8.0 lb/hp), is significantly less powerful (265 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM), has 1 row of seats (1 vs 2) and slightly slower 1/4 mile time (13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph vs 12.6 s s @ 115.0 mph mph).

2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2010 Porsche 911 GT3
$113,150

Significant advantages of the 911 GT3 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Significantly higher top speed: 193 mph vs 155 mph
  • Significantly more powerful: 435 HP @ 7,600 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Optional roof rails

Significant disadvantages of the 911 GT3 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 21 mpg vs 31 mpg
  • Much more expensive: $113,150 vs $50,875
  • Worse city mileage: 14 mpg vs 22 mpg

common strengths of the 911 GT3 and TT TTS

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2010 Porsche 911 GT3 vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Audi TT

2011 Audi TT
$39,175

Significant advantages of the TT (vs the TT TTS)

  • Number of rows of seating: 2 vs 1
  • More seats: 4 vs 2
  • Folding rear seats comes standard

Significant disadvantages of the TT (vs the TT TTS)

  • No subwoofer
  • No speed sensitive volume

common strengths of the TT and TT TTS

  • Both very efficient on the highway: 31 mpg vs 31 mpg
  • Both very efficient in the city: 22 mpg vs 22 mpg
  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability: 0.95 g vs 0.95 g
arrow Compare the TT vs the TT TTS

2012 Jaguar XKR

2012 Jaguar XKR
$104,375

Significant advantages of the XKR (vs the TT TTS)

  • Number of rows of seating: 2 vs 1
  • More seats: 4 vs 2
  • Much more powerful: 510 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the XKR (vs the TT TTS)

  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 22 mpg vs 31 mpg
  • Much more expensive: $104,375 vs $50,875
  • Significantly more trips to the pumps when driving on the highway: 354 miles vs 490 miles

common strengths of the XKR and TT TTS

  • Both vehicles have above average braking abilities for this class of vehicle: 111 ft vs 115 ft
  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 12.6 s s @ 115.0 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Supercharger vs Turbocharger
arrow Compare the 2012 Jaguar XKR vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 Sport

2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 Sport
$34,865

Significant advantages of the C300 Sport (vs the TT TTS)

  • Number of rows of seating: 2 vs 1
  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Many more airbags: 6 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the C300 Sport (vs the TT TTS)

  • Only has all-wheel drive: rear-wheel drive vs all-wheel drive
  • Paddle shifters not available
  • Significantly longer braking distance from 60mph: 129 ft vs 115 ft

common strengths of the C300 Sport and TT TTS

  • Inexpensive: $34,865 vs $50,875
  • Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
arrow Compare the 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300 Sport vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2012 Audi R8 GT

2012 Audi R8 GT
$198,050

Significant advantages of the R8 GT (vs the TT TTS)

  • Much more powerful: 560 HP @ 8,000 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Sportier performance: 6.0 lb/hp vs 12.8 lb/hp
  • Significantly shorter braking distance from 60mph: 100 ft vs 115 ft

Significant disadvantages of the R8 GT (vs the TT TTS)

  • Much more expensive: $198,050 vs $50,875
  • Significantly worse highway mileage: 19 mpg vs 31 mpg
  • Significantly worse city mileage: 13 mpg vs 22 mpg

common strengths of the R8 GT and TT TTS

  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability: 1 g vs 0.95 g
  • Both vehicles have above average braking abilities for this class of vehicle: 100 ft vs 115 ft
  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 11.6 s s @ 122.1 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
arrow Compare the R8 GT vs the TT TTS

2010 Porsche 911 Turbo

2010 Porsche 911 Turbo
$133,750

Significant advantages of the 911 Turbo (vs the TT TTS)

  • More seats: 4 vs 2
  • Much more powerful: 500 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Significantly higher top speed: 194 mph vs 155 mph

Significant disadvantages of the 911 Turbo (vs the TT TTS)

  • Much more expensive: $133,750 vs $50,875
  • Lacks auxiliary audio input jack
  • Worse highway mileage: 24 mpg vs 31 mpg

common strengths of the 911 Turbo and TT TTS

  • Both vehicles have good cornering ability: 1.01 g vs 0.95 g
  • Both vehicles have above average braking abilities for this class of vehicle: 101 ft vs 115 ft
  • Both posted zippy 1/4 mile times: 11.2 s s @ 125.3 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph
arrow Compare the 2010 Porsche 911 Turbo vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

compared to super car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the TT TTS compared to super car competitors include: it has standard paddle shifters (standard vs not available) and has a turbocharger to get maximum performance from the engine (turbocharger vs none).

However, on average it is much more sluggish (12.8 lb/hp vs 5.8 lb/hp), is much less powerful (265 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 600 HP @ 6,100 RPM), much slower 0-60 time (5.2 seconds vs 2.9 seconds), much longer braking distance from 60mph (115 ft vs 101 ft) and much slower 1/4 mile time (13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph vs 11.2 s s @ 122.7 mph mph).

2012 Nissan GT-R Black Edition

2012 Nissan GT-R Black Edition
$96,100

Significant advantages of the GT-R Black Edition (vs the TT TTS)

  • Sportier performance: 7.2 lb/hp vs 12.8 lb/hp
  • Much more powerful: 530 HP @ 6,400 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM
  • Much faster 0-60 mph time: 2.9 seconds vs 5.2 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the GT-R Black Edition (vs the TT TTS)

  • None found

common strengths of the GT-R Black Edition and TT TTS

  • Both have an air compressor to maximize power output: Twin turbocharger vs Turbocharger
  • Both come standard with paddle shifters
arrow Compare the 2012 Nissan GT-R Black Edition vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2010 Dodge Viper SRT-10

2010 Dodge Viper SRT-10
$96,681

Significant advantages of the Viper SRT-10 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Sportier performance: 5.8 lb/hp vs 12.8 lb/hp
  • Much more powerful: 600 HP @ 6,100 RPM vs 265 HP @ 6,000 RPM

Significant disadvantages of the Viper SRT-10 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Paddle shifters not available

common strengths of the Viper SRT-10 and TT TTS

  • None found
arrow Compare the 2010 Dodge Viper SRT-10 vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

compared to mid-size SUV competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the TT TTS compared to mid-size SUV competitors include: it is significantly more fuel efficient in the city (22 mpg vs 15 mpg), is much more fuel efficient on the highway (31 mpg vs 22 mpg), is slightly sportier (12.8 lb/hp vs 16.8 lb/hp), has a slightly longer-lasting basic warranty (4 year vs 3 year) and has a slightly longer basic warranty (50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile).

However, on average it has much less cargo space (8.8 ft3 vs 64.0 ft3), has much fewer seats (2 vs 5), has significantly fewer airbags (4 vs 6), gets slightly less from a tank of gas in the city (348 miles vs 422 miles) and gets slightly less from a tank of gas on the highway (490 miles vs 607 miles).

2011 Porsche Cayenne

2011 Porsche Cayenne
$47,675

Significant advantages of the Cayenne (vs the TT TTS)

  • Much more cargo room: 62.9 ft3 vs 8.8 ft3
  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Many more airbags: 6 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the Cayenne (vs the TT TTS)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 22 mpg vs 31 mpg
  • Significantly worse city mileage: 15 mpg vs 22 mpg
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger

common strengths of the Cayenne and TT TTS

  • Both provide sporty handling: 14.7 lb/hp vs 12.8 lb/hp
  • Both vehicles have good 0-60 times: 7.8 seconds vs 5.2 seconds
  • Good highway range: 493 miles vs 490 miles
arrow Compare the 2011 Porsche Cayenne vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Volkswagen Touareg VR6 Lux

2011 Volkswagen Touareg VR6 Lux
$49,120

Significant advantages of the Touareg VR6 Lux (vs the TT TTS)

  • Much more cargo room: 64.0 ft3 vs 8.8 ft3
  • Much roomier front seats: 56.7 ft3 vs 47.6 ft3
  • More seats: 5 vs 2

Significant disadvantages of the Touareg VR6 Lux (vs the TT TTS)

  • Much worse highway mileage: 23 mpg vs 31 mpg
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger
  • Significantly worse city mileage: 16 mpg vs 22 mpg

common strengths of the Touareg VR6 Lux and TT TTS

  • Good highway range: 607 miles vs 490 miles
  • Both have power seats for the passenger
  • The {better}'s standard navigation system will ensure you never get lost again; optional upgrade required on the {worse}
arrow Compare the 2011 Volkswagen Touareg VR6 Lux vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

compared to car competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the TT TTS compared to car competitors include: it is significantly sportier (12.8 lb/hp vs 21.4 lb/hp), is slightly more powerful (265 HP @ 6,000 RPM vs 140 HP @ 4,000 RPM), has a slightly longer basic warranty (50,000 mile vs 36,000 mile), has better traction (all-wheel drive vs front-wheel drive) and has smoother suspension (independent vs semi-independent).

However, on average it costs more ($50,875 vs $24,955), has much fewer seats (2 vs 5), has significantly fewer airbags (4 vs 6), has slightly less spacious front seats (47.6 ft3 vs 51.3 ft3) and has 1 row of seats (1 vs 2).

2012 Fiat 500 Lounge

2012 Fiat 500 Lounge
$20,000

Significant advantages of the 500 Lounge (vs the TT TTS)

  • Number of rows of seating: 2 vs 1
  • More seats: 4 vs 2
  • Many more airbags: 6 vs 4

Significant disadvantages of the 500 Lounge (vs the TT TTS)

  • Only has all-wheel drive: front-wheel drive vs all-wheel drive
  • Sluggish performance: 24.1 lb/hp vs 12.8 lb/hp
  • Lacks a supercharger or turbocharger: None vs Turbocharger

common strengths of the 500 Lounge and TT TTS

  • Longer basic warranty: 50,000 mile vs 50,000 mile
  • Longer-lasting basic warranty: 4 year vs 4 year
  • Both offer an upgrade to a navigation system
arrow Compare the 2012 Fiat 500 Lounge vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2012 Volvo S60 T6

2012 Volvo S60 T6
$38,575

Significant advantages of the S60 T6 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Number of rows of seating: 2 vs 1
  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Significantly roomier front seats: 52.9 ft3 vs 47.6 ft3

Significant disadvantages of the S60 T6 (vs the TT TTS)

  • Power outlets not available
  • Paddle shifters not available
  • Lower top speed: 133 mph vs 155 mph

common strengths of the S60 T6 and TT TTS

  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Turbocharger vs Turbocharger
  • Both have good drivetrains for driving off-road or in poor weather: all-wheel drive vs all-wheel drive
  • Longer-lasting basic warranty: 5 year vs 4 year
arrow Compare the 2012 Volvo S60 T6 vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS

2011 Volkswagen Golf TDI

2011 Volkswagen Golf TDI
$24,955

Significant advantages of the Golf TDI (vs the TT TTS)

  • Number of rows of seating: 2 vs 1
  • More seats: 5 vs 2
  • Significantly better highway mileage: 42 mpg vs 31 mpg

Significant disadvantages of the Golf TDI (vs the TT TTS)

  • Only has all-wheel drive: front-wheel drive vs all-wheel drive
  • Power mirrors not available
  • Much slower 1/4 mile time: 17.1 s s @ 81.0 mph mph vs 13.5 s s @ 104.0 mph mph

common strengths of the Golf TDI and TT TTS

  • Both have an air compressor, quite rare for this class of vehicle: Turbocharger vs Turbocharger
  • Both offer an upgrade to a navigation system
  • Rock on in the {better}; but prepare to pay to get a CD player in the {worse}
arrow Compare the 2011 Volkswagen Golf TDI vs the 2011 Audi TT TTS